How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

In the case of many students at IGNOU The review of literature can be the most elusive element of the project. This is especially true when working on an ignou project for mcom, where academic rigor is expected, yet guidance frequently feels a bit limited. Students generally ask whether they should write down their book chapters, rewrite journal articles, or simply gather quotes. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project.

A literature review is not a document that demonstrates how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you have grasped the literature that is relevant to the topic you're researching and how your project is a part of it. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to this chapter since it showcases your ability to connect knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it is crucial to comprehend why the section exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three essential functions.

First, it shows that the topic you chose has been studied earlier and is of academic importance. Second, it aids you find gaps or weaknesses in prior research. In addition, it can provide the foundation for your research goals and your methodology.

Many students take this chapter as a formality, and take content from other assignments or online sources. This often results in failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU does not require original writing when discussing existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. The same time, very basic explanations are discouraged. When a ignou mcom project is being developed, the review of literature should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You are expected to review research papers, books and reports, as well as journals and occasionally, government publications that relate to your research area. The main focus should be on those studies that directly link to the area of your study.

In this case, for example, if your research is focused on the financial performance of banks So, your literature reviews must focus on earlier research in relation to financial ratios performances of banks, profitability studies, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One of the most common mistakes students make is to select too many irrelevant sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For a project in ignou between 15 and 20 sturdy sources is usually sufficient in the event that they are carefully selected.

These are good sources for academic journals well-known books written by renowned writer, RBI publishing, state reports as well as university research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. It is possible to include older studies only if they're of a fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve perception and readability. Instead of writing random summaries, you can divide all the reviews of books into logical sections.

You may organize the chapter around themes, a time period techniques, methodologies, or variables which are being studied. For example, one section may cover studies related profitability, another may focus on liquidity while the other one on operational efficiency.

This structure assists evaluators to understand the difference between copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid dense language and excessive jargon. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Each research study you write about should include the name of the author, year of study, goal, methodology, and the main findings. However, don't list them mechanically. Try to connect one study with a different one.

If you're discussing some research, you might describe how another researcher supported or refuted these findings. The comparative approach adds more an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review as an academic chapter. Basic concepts such as definition of accounting or meaning of management doesn't belong in this section unless it is directly connected with previous research.

Another error is quoting too much. Your review of literature should be written in your own words. This shows your understanding. copying implies dependence.

They also fail to link studies to their own research study. The research you refer to should be in a direct connection to the objectives of your project.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of important results of the review of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU examiners expect you identify what earlier researchers didn't know or where more research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies you may observe that most studies focused on large corporations smaller firms were disregarded. It is also possible that previous studies used secondary data, but primary data was limited.

This gap serves as the rationale for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your plan could appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but it is more about consistency than perfection.

Each study covered must appear in the reference list at the end of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. In-text citations are more efficient and appears more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of an essay on literature should last. There's no set timeframe but for an for an mcom project, the length typically spans from fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length of the discussion should be based on what the topic's difficulty. A topic that is more extensive requires the most research, whereas a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.

Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
The author analyzed the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write this way
In the year A, Author B conducted research on banking performance by using financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased because of better asset administration. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B who highlighted the importance of the efficiency of operations in enhancing bank profits.

This is an approach that demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is appreciated in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get cancelled or delayed due published literature reviews that have been copied. Even if your reference is to past studies, your language should be unique to your project.

Utilize plagiarism checking software if possible and rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom task, revisit the review carefully. Verify that each research is relevant, whether the flow is logical, and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes, that literature study is in the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for a ignou mcom project might be difficult at first Particularly for students returning to university after a gap. When you realize it is more about analysis and connecting than memorizing information, the task becomes easier to manage.

Read, think and write in your own voice. This dedication is clearly reflected on the final piece and can make the difference between an average submission and a high-quality one.