How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

Many students taking part in IGNOU reviews of literature is often the most difficult element of the project. This is especially true for students working on the ignou master's degree project where academic depth is expected. However, guidance often appears to be limited. Students usually inquire if they must summarize books, rewrite journal articles, or simply gather quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not written to show how much material you have read. It is written to show how well you comprehend the current research related to your area of study and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter since it showcases your ability to connect theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it is crucial to understand why this chapter is necessary in an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three essential functions.

First, it shows that the subject you chose has been researched before in the academic world and is relevant to research. Thirdly, it assists you discover gaps or issues in earlier studies. It also provides the foundation for your research goals and your methodology.

Many students see this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous assignments or web-based sources. This can result in poor marks or even project rejection. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. In the same way simple explanations are prohibited. In an ignou project the literature review should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

You will be required to read research papers, books journals, reports, and sometimes government publications related in your research topic. The emphasis should be placed on studies which are directly related to your research topic.

If, for instance, your project is focusing on the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you must focus on earlier research about financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is deciding to use too many disparate sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. For a project in ignou in the range of 15 to 20 high-quality sources are often enough if they are well chosen.

Academic journals are a good option well-known books written by renowned names, RBI papers, official reports and even university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

The best studies are those that are current which are typically from the last 10 years. It is possible to include older studies only if they are foundational in way.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter increases reading comprehension and creates a positive impression. Instead of writing random summaries of the work, break down your literature reviews into logical sections.

You may organize the chapter in accordance with themes, time period methods, or variables to be studied. For example, one section might focus on studies that relate to profitability, whereas another might focus on liquidity and another regarding operational efficiency.

This structure helps evaluators understand that you are not just taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is academic, but simple. Avoid overly complicated language and words. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Each study that you talk about must be listed with the author's name, year of study, purpose, method, and major findings. It is not necessary to list them mechanically. Try to connect one study with a different one.

When you've discussed one study, you could explain how another author's work supported the results or countered them. This sort of comparative approach will add richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review like it is a textbook chapter. In explaining the basics of concepts like what accounting is and the meaning of management isn't appropriate in this section unless it is directly connected to previous research.

Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your literature review should be written by you in individual words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying indicates dependence.

Many students do not connect publications to their personal research topics. Any study you discuss must be clearly connected to your objectives for your project.

Links Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key outcomes of a review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU assessment committees expect you identify what earlier researchers didn't know or where further study is required.

After examining a variety of studies, it's possible that studies were focused on large businesses as small businesses were overlooked. And earlier studies used secondary data but primary data was not as extensive.

This gap becomes the justification for your Ingou MCOM project. Without this, your project could appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however consistent writing is more important than flawlessness.

All studies discussed must be included in the list of references at the end of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. A citation in text works better and is cleaner when used in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the literature review should be. There's no standard rule but for an to do an MCOM project the chapter typically spans from fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length should depend on topics' complexity. A broad topic will require more studies, while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.

A review that is too long and without analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A did a thorough study of the performance of the banking industry and came to positive results

Write as such
For example, author A performed a study examining bank performance by using financial ratios. He found that profitability improved due to improved asset management. This was later validated by Author B who highlighted the importance of the efficiency of operations in enhancing the bank's returns.

This approach reflects the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is a must in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get denied or delayed because of review of literature that has been copied. Even if your reference is to previous research, the language should be unique to your project.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when you can and then rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is far better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom assignment, you should read the review of literature carefully. Make sure that each study is relevant, if your flow follows logically and whether the chapter flows naturally towards your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear why my research is necessary. If yes, it's on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature as part of an IGNOU MCOM project writing services; bebivita.ua, master's thesis may feel challenging at first especially for students returning to academics following a gap. But once you recognize that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorizing, the job is a lot easier.

You should take the time to read, think, and write in your own voice. The effort you put into it will show clearly into the final version of your work. This often can be the difference in two submissions: a standard one and a high-quality one.