How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

In the case of many students at IGNOU it is the reviewing of research becomes the most confusing component of their project. This is especially the case for students working on an ignou mcom project, in which academic depth is expected, however guidance often feels limited. Students usually inquire if they require a summation of their books, refret journal articles or simply take notes of quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not written to reveal how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate that you are knowledgeable about the existing work related to your topic and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to this chapter because it reflects your ability to connect theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, however, it is crucial to consider the reasons the chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature reviews serve three primary purposes.

First, it shows it is clear that the topic you've chosen has been extensively studied and is of academic importance. Second, it helps you determine the gaps or shortcomings in prior research. In addition, it can provide an understanding of studies' goals and research methodology.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality, and duplicate content from previous projects or other sources online. This usually leads to very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU is seeking original and unique writing even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. Additionally the use of very basic explanations is also discouraged. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment the literature review must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

You're expected to study research papers, books, journals, reports, and, sometimes, government publications relevant to the subject you are researching. The primary focus should be on research which directly relate to your research topic.

If, for instance, your research focuses on the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis will focus on prior studies concerning financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. It's more about quality than quantity. When it comes to an ignou mcom project approximately fifteen to twenty good sources can be found in the event that they are carefully selected.

These are good sources for academic journals highly regarded books by well-known author, RBI publication, reports from the government, and university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always go for the most recent research particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. Older studies can be included in the event that they are fundamental in terms of.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve readership and impression. Instead of composing random summaries, break up chapters of a literature analysis into clear sections.

You may organize the chapter around themes, a time period, methodology, or variables researched. For instance, one section may examine studies that pertain to profit, while another could concentrate on liquidity, and a third one on operational efficiency.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you're not simply copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be academic but simple. Avoid excessive language and language. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.

Each study that you talk about must be listed with the author's name, year of study, methodological objective, most important results. However, you shouldn't list them in a linear manner. It is best to connect one study with a different one.

In the case of discussing some research, you might be able to mention that another author's findings backed or opposed those findings. This comparative approach adds complexity to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to compose the literature review like an academic chapter. Explaining basic concepts such as the definition of accounting or the meaning of management do not belong in this section unless it is directly connected to earlier studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written in Your own voice. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying demonstrates dependency.

They also fail to link literature with their own research issue. Each study you reference should be clearly linked to your objectives for your project.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most important outcomes of reviewing the literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU evaluaters want you to explain what the previous researchers missed or the areas where more study is needed.

When you look over a range of studies it's possible that research focused on large firms while smaller companies were unaddressed. The earlier studies also used secondary data but primary data was limited.

This gap becomes the justification for your project in the ignou MCOM project work IGNOU. Without it, your project will appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however quality is more important than consistency.

Each study covered must appear in the reference list at the end of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. The in-text citation is better and is more professional in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the literature review should be. There's no rule of thumb but for an MCOM project, the chapter usually spans from fifteen cents at to two thousand.

The length of the discussion should be based on topics' complexity. For a broad topic, you will need more study, while a targeted topic requires fewer, but more in-depth discussions.

Reviewing unnecessarily long without analysis does not improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A conducted a study of the bank's performance and got good results

Write in this manner
An author conducted a study about banking performance using financial ratios and found that profitability improved through better asset management. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the importance of operational efficiency in enhancing bank profitability.

This strategy demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is what counts in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get deferred or even rejected due to duplicated literature reviews. Even if the reference is to earlier studies, the language should be unique to your project.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible, and modify content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou-mcom project, go back through the literature review carefully. Check whether each study is relevant, whether the flow is logical and if the chapter is logically linked to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify why my study is needed. If the answer is yes then your review on literature will be in the best path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou MCOM project could be daunting at first particularly for students who are returning to university after a gap. But once you know that it is all about connection and analysis rather than memorization, it is manageable.

It is important to take time to read, consider, and write in your own voice. The effort you put into it will show clearly in the final work. It often is the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a solid one.