How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

There are many students who enroll in IGNOU review, reviewing literature is often the most difficult aspect of the work. This is particularly true for those working on an ignou mcom project, where academic depth is expected, however guidance often feels limited. Students usually ask if are required to summarize books or write journal articles in a different way, or simply gather quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that differences can affect the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not intended to be a record of how much of the literature you've read. It is written to show how well you comprehend the current work in relation to the topic of your choice and how you work fits in. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to connect theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, however, it must be understood why this section is part of an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three primary purposes.

First, it demonstrates it is clear that the topic you've chosen has been studied earlier as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Second, it aids you recognize gaps or limitations in earlier studies. The third is that it creates an outline for your research objectives and methodological.

Many students see this chapter as a formality, and take content from other projects or sources on the internet. This approach usually results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU requires original work even when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. On the other hand simple explanations are prohibited. For an ignou master's degree project the literature review must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

You will be required to read research papers, books journal articles, reports, and sometimes, government publications related to your topic. The focus should be on studies relevant to your research area.

In the case of example, if your research is focused on the financial performance of banks So, your literature reviews should focus on prior research related to financial ratios, performances of banks, profitability studies, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For an IGNOU MCOM project submission guide (url) mcom project approximately fifteen to twenty high-quality sources are often enough provided they are selected with care.

An excellent source of information is academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned authors RBI documents, Government reports as well as university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. Older studies can be included in the event that they are fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve the readability and impact. Instead of writing random summaries, break up all the reviews of books into sensible sections.

You can organize the chapter based on themes, time period methods, or variables examined. For instance, one chapter could focus on studies related profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity, while another regarding operational efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding that you're not simply copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be simple and academic. Avoid overly complicated language and use of jargon. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Every research you share should include the author's name, the year of study, the objective, methodology, as well as principal findings. However, do not list them in a formal manner. You should try to link one study with another.

In the case of discussing one study, it is possible to mention how another author supported the results or countered them. This approach of comparing studies adds depth to your ignou MCOM project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to write the literature review like the kind of chapter in a textbook. Simply explaining concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management should not be included in this article unless they are directly linked to earlier studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your review of literature should be written in one's own terms. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while copying implies dependence.

They are also often unable to link literature with their own research study. Each study you reference should have a clear link to the goals of your project.

Establishing a linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the major results of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to identify what earlier researchers didn't know or the areas in which further research is required.

After examining a variety of studies, you may observe that most research was focused on large companies in contrast to small businesses being left out. In the past, studies utilized secondary data, whereas primary data was limited.

This gap is the basis for your ignou mcom project. Without it, the project might appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however consistency matters more than perfection.

Every study discussed must appear in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. A text-based citation is more efficient and looks more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long their literature reviews should be. There's no rule of thumb but, for an ignou MCOM project, the chapter generally ranges from fifteen hundred or two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the complexity of the topic. A topic that is more extensive requires more research while a specific topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A conducted a study of the performance of the banking industry and came to positive results

Write this in the same way as
For example, author A conducted a study of the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study concluded that profitability increased through better asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B who also emphasized the role of operational efficiency in enhancing bank profits.

This approach reflects understanding and analysis, which is appreciated in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get blocked or rejected because of plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if the reference is to previously published studies, the style you use must reflect the original.

Use plagiarism checking tools as possible. Then, rewrite the content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is much better than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou-mcom project, read the literature review attentively. Make sure that each study is relevant, if you can follow the logic of the review and if the chapters flow naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain what my study needs to be done. If yes your literature review is on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou-mcom project may feel challenging at first Particularly for students returning to university after a gap. But once you understand that it's about connection and analysis, rather than recitation, the challenge becomes doable.

Make time to read, think, and write with your own voice. It is reflected clearly in the final work. It often can be the difference in the average submission and a high-quality one.