사이트 로그인
2026.01.17 15:45
For many students enrolled in IGNOU, the review of studies can be the most challenging aspect of the work. This is especially the case in the case of an ignou-mcom project where academic depth is expected, but the guidance isn't as clear. Students typically ask if they are required to summarize books or write journal articles in a different way, or simply gather quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and understanding that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project.
A review of literature is not written to reveal the amount of material you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend the previous work that pertains to your area of study and how your research fits into it. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to this chapter because it reflects your ability to link the research directions with your theory.
Before you write anything, it important to be aware of the reason this particular chapter is required in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three primary purposes.
In the first place, it indicates that the subject you picked already has been explored and has academic significance. It also helps you detect gaps or deficiencies in prior research. Thirdly it helps you establish an outline of your research goals and the methodology.
Many students approach this chapter as a formality, and take content from other projects or sources on the internet. This approach usually results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU demands original writing even when discussing studies that are already in progress.
IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. At the same time the use of very basic explanations is as well discouraged. When a ignou mcom project is being developed, the review of literature must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.
You're required to read books, research papers Journals, reports, and sometimes even government publications related with your field. The focus should be on studies closely related to the research area you are studying.
As an example, if the project is focusing on the financial performance of banks Then your literature review should focus on prior research regarding financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk evaluation.
A common error students make is picking too many unrelated sources. Quality is more important than quantity. For a project involving ignou MCOM IGNOU solved project (visit the following web page) anywhere between fifteen and twenty good sources can be found for a good selection.
These are good sources for academic journals well-known books written by renowned authors, RBI publications, government reports, and university level research papers. Websites that lack clarity on the author should be avoided.
The best studies are those that are current that are from the last 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if the studies are fundamental in their nature.
A well-organized chapter can improve understanding and perception. Instead of composing unstructured summaries, split chapters of a literature analysis into sensible sections.
You can organize the chapter in accordance with themes, time period and methodology or even variables the authors have studied. For example, one section may examine studies that pertain to profit, while another could concentrate on liquidity and another concerning operational efficiency.
The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you're not simply copying content, but rather analyzing it.
The style of writing should be simple but academic. Avoid overly complicated language and terms. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.
Each study you analyze should be accompanied by the name of the author, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as major findings. It is not necessary to list them in a linear manner. Try to connect one research with a different one.
When you've discussed one study, you may highlight how another author's study supported the results or countered them. This comparative approach adds richness to your ignou project.
An error that is often made is to write the literature review like it is a textbook chapter. Basic concepts such as the definition of accounting and the meaning of management do not belong in this section unless it is directly connected with previous research.
Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in one's own terms. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas copying shows dependency.
They are also often unable to link books to their own research focus. Each study you discuss should have a clear connection to your research objectives.
The most important results of a review of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or the areas in which further research is required.
After reviewing a number of studies, you will notice that the majority of research focused on large firms but small companies were absent. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, whereas primary data was limited.
This void is the reason for your an ignou project. Without it, the project might appear monotonous.
In writing a review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however the consistency is more important than perfection.
Each study covered must appear in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.
Avoid footnotes during a literature review. A citation in text works better and is more professional in an ignou mcom project.
Students often ask how long the reviews of books should be. There's no rule of thumb, but for an ignou MCOM project, the length of this chapter generally spans from fifteen to in length to 2500 words.
The length of the discussion should be based on the subject's complexity. A topic that is more extensive requires more research while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.
Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analysis does not improve marks.
Instead of writing this way,
Author A researched the bank's performance and got good results
Write in this manner
An author conducted an investigation on banking performance with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability improved because of better asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the role of operational efficiency in increasing return on investment for banks.
This approach is based on the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is essential to an MCOM project.
IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get refused or delayed because of published literature reviews that have been copied. However, even if you use previous studies, the language will have to match your own.
Use plagiarism checking tools if possible. Then, rewrite the content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence will be more appealing than perfect copying.
Prior to submitting your ignou mcom project, make sure you read your literature review carefully. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, whether the flow is logical and whether the chapter is logically linked to your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this section explain what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes that literature study is in the right track.

Reviewing literature for an ignou MCOM project can be a challenge at first Particularly for students returning to school after a break. But once you understand that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorization of information, the task becomes easier to manage.
Make time to read, think, and write in your own voice. It is reflected clearly in the final work. It often marks the difference between the average submission and a outstanding one.