How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU and IGNOU, the study of literature can be the most confusing element of the project. This is especially the case when working on an ignou MCOM project where academic depth is expected, yet guidance frequently appears to be limited. Students generally ask whether they must summarize books, revise journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is NOT written to illustrate the quantity of information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend the works that are currently being done on your area of study and how your project is integrated into it. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to connect theoretical concepts to research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, is crucial to consider the reasons the chapter exists in an ignou MCOM IGNOU solved project - read this blog post from Hifrequency, project. The review of literature serves three principal purposes.

First, it demonstrates that the area you've selected has been researched before as well as having a relevance for academic studies. The second is that it assists you to determine the gaps or shortcomings in prior research. In addition, it can provide an understanding of studies' goals and research methodology.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality and copy content from earlier projects or even from online sources. The result is usually low marks or project rejection. IGNOU will require original content even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. However those who write merely to explain their ideas are discouraged. In an ignou project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.

You're required to read research papers, books Journals, reports, and sometimes, government publications related to your field of study. The attention should be focused on studies that directly link to your research area.

For example, if your research focuses on the financial performance of banks Then your literature review should focus on earlier studies about financial ratios financial performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most common mistake students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. It's more about quality than quantity. For a project in ignou about fifteen to twenty strong sources are usually enough for a good selection.

A good source is academic journals, reputed books by known writers, RBI publications, federal reports and even university research papers. Websites with ambiguous authorship should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies that are from the last 10 years. Older studies can be included only if they're fundamental in study.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of writing random summaries, break up each literature overview into logical sections.

You can structure the chapter around themes, a time period method, variables, or methodologies to be studied. For instance, one chapter may discuss studies related to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, and a third concerning operational efficiency.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you're not copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be simple but academic. Avoid overly complicated language and terms. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Each study you present should include the name of the author, year of study, goals, methodology, as well as most important results. But, don't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Make sure to connect one study with another.

For example, after discussing an article, you can refer to how an author's findings were supported or refuted these findings. The comparative approach adds more an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review in the form of a textbook chapter. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management is not a good idea here unless directly linked to prior studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your review of literature should be written in you own language. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas writing in a copy shows dependency.

They also fail to link works to their research focus. Every study you write about should have a clear connection to your project objectives.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main outcomes of a review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluaters want you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or the areas in which further research is needed.

In the course of discussing several studies you'll find that a lot of studies centered on large organizations while smaller companies were overlooked. Or that earlier studies used secondary data, whereas primary data was scarce.

This void is the reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project may appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature It is vital to have a correct citation. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however quality is more important than consistency.

Each research study should be included in the list of references at the end of the study. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. Citation in text is more effective and looks cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the review of literature must last. There is no fixed rule but, for an ignou for an mcom project, the length generally ranges from fifteen hundred -two thousand words.

The length should be determined by the level of complexity of the topic. A topic that is more extensive requires more research, while a focused topic needs fewer but more in-depth discussions.

Reviewing unnecessarily long without an analysis won't help marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A has studied the performance of banks and came up with positive results

Write like this
In the year A, Author B carried out a study on the performance of banks using financial ratios. It concluded that profitability increased thanks to better asset control. This conclusion was later validated by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the importance of operational efficiency in improving bank profits.

This approach reflects an understanding and analysis that is what counts in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are delayed or rejected due to copy-pasted literature reviews. If you do refer to previous studies, the language needs to reflect your unique style.

Use plagiarism checking tools if feasible and revise content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Prior to submitting your ignou mcom project, go through the literature review carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, whether your flow follows logically and whether the chapter is logically linked to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the reason for why I need to study it. If the answer is yes, you're on the correct track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou-mcom project may feel challenging at first Particularly for students returning to university after a gap. Once you realize that it is more about connecting and analysis than memorization of information, the task is a lot easier.

You should take the time to read, think, and write in your own voice. This is reflected in the final project and frequently makes the difference between an average essay and a well-crafted one.