How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

In the case of many students at IGNOU The review of research becomes the most confusing part of the project work. This is especially the case for those who are working on an ignou-mcom project where academic rigor is expected. However, instruction often feels limited. Students usually ask whether they have to write a summary of books, rewrite journal articles, or simply gather quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not written to show how much literature you've read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the available research on the topic of your choice and how you research fits into it. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter due to your ability to link the research directions with your theory.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it is crucial to consider the reasons this chapter is essential to an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three primary functions.

First, it demonstrates that the topic you selected has been studied earlier and has a scientific significance. Thirdly, it assists you identify gaps or limitations in earlier studies. Third, it provides the basis for your research goals and your methodology.

Most students view this section as a formality and copy content from earlier projects or from online sources. This typically results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU MCOM project submission guide (aykhal.info) requires original work even when discussing studies that are already in progress.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. While doing so any explanation that is not basic is not permitted. In an ignou project the literature review should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You're expected to study research papers, books Journals, reports, and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your area of study. The emphasis should be placed on studies closely related to the research area you are studying.

For example, if your project is focusing on the financial performance of banks Your literature review must focus on earlier research dealing with financial ratios efficiency of banks, profitability analyses, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. More important is quality than quantity. When it comes to an ignou mcom project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 powerful sources are generally enough should they be selected carefully.

These are good sources for academic journals reliable books from well-known creators, RBI publications, federal reports and even university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

The best studies are those that are current at least from the last ten years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if they are foundational in way.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve quality of reading and impression. Instead of writing random summaries of the work, break down sections of the review in logical sections.

You may organize the chapter according to themes, time period and methodology or even variables which are being studied. For example, one section may cover studies related profitability, whereas another might focus on liquidity, and yet another about operational effectiveness.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you're more than just copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be simple and academic. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary vocabulary. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.

Each study you present should be listed with the author's name, the year of study, the objective, methodology, as well as main findings. However, you shouldn't list them in a linear manner. Make sure to connect one study to another.

For instance, after discussing some study, you can refer to how an author's findings were supported or opposed those findings. This type of analysis adds depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to write the literature review like the kind of chapter in a textbook. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting or the meaning of management does not belong here unless directly linked to other studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in an individual way. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas writing in a copy shows dependency.

Many students do not connect studies to their own research focus. Every research you present should have a clear connection to the objectives of your project.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of important outcomes of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU reviewers expect you to be able to demonstrate what prior researchers missed or indicate where additional research is required.

After looking over several studies, you will notice that the majority of studies focus on large organisations however small companies were unaddressed. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, whereas primary data was not enough.

This is why it's the main reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project may appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally follows APA style, but quality is more important than consistency.

Each research study should be included in the list of references at the end of the study. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. In-text citations are more efficient and appears better in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the reviews of books should last. There's no standard rule to follow, but for an assignment in mcom, this chapter typically spans from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the level of complexity of the topic. A broad topic will require greater research, whereas a focussed topic requires less but deeper discussions.

Inadequately long reviews and no the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A researched the performance of banks and came up with positive results

Create this type of writing
The author A conducted a research study on the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study concluded that profitability increased because of improved asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B who stressed the role of operational efficiency in improving bank profitability.

This strategy demonstrates understanding and analysis, which can be valued in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get denied or delayed because of the use of copied literature reviews. Even if the reference is to prior studies, the language is yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible. If you are able, modify your content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou assignment, you should read the literature review carefully. Verify that each research is relevant, if the flow of information is clear, and whether the chapters naturally connect to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain the reasons for my research. If yes then your study's literature reviews are on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature to complete an ignou mcom research project is not easy at first particularly for students who are returning to academics after a gap. But once you understand that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorizing information, the task becomes doable.

Read, consider, and write with your own voice. This is reflected into the final version of your work. This often can be the difference in your average work and a well-crafted one.