How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For a lot of students studying at IGNOU, the review of literature can be the most elusive section of the work. This is especially true for students working on an ignou mcom project, in which academic depth is expected, but the guidance feels a bit limited. Students usually ask if need to summarize books, make journal articles more readable, or simply collect quotes. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that a difference could affect the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not written to show how much literature you've read. It is written to show that you are knowledgeable about the available research on your area of study and how your work fits in. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter because it reflects your ability to link knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it is crucial to understand why this chapter is needed in an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three essential functions.

First, it demonstrates that the subject you chose is one that has been studied in the past and is of academic importance. Additionally, it can help you find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. The third is that it creates an outline for your research objectives and your methodology.

Students often view this chapter as a formality, and duplicate content from previous assignments or other online sources. This usually leads to failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. Additionally any explanation that is not basic is also not recommended. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment the literature review will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

You'll be expected to read research papers, books or reports, journals and sometimes government publications related to your subject. The study should focus on topics related to your research area.

In the case of example, if your project focuses on the financial health of banks If so, your literature analysis will focus on prior studies concerning financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One mistake that students often make is to select too many irrelevant sources. More important is quality than quantity. For a project in ignou roughly fifteen to twenty solid sources are typically enough If they're chosen with care.

These are good sources for academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned creators, RBI books, public reports and university level research papers. Websites with unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always go for the most recent research especially those from the past ten years. Older studies can be included only if they're fundamental in nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter enhances reading comprehension and creates a positive impression. Instead of composing short summaries that are not organized, divide an overview of literature into clear sections.

It is possible to organize the chapter by themes, time period and methodology or even variables which are being studied. For instance, one chapter might discuss studies on the financial performance, while another may focus upon liquidity, while another on operational efficiency.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you are not just copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be straightforward but academic. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary jargon. IGNOU places emphasis on clarity over complexity.

Every research you share should include the author name, year of study, goal, methodology, and the main findings. Do not, however, list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Do your best to link one study with another.

For instance, when discussing some research, you might mention how another author supported the results or countered them. This approach of comparing studies adds complexity to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review in the form of a textbook chapter. In explaining the basics of concepts like how accounting works or the meaning of management doesn't belong here unless directly linked to other studies.

Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your review of literature should be written by you in you own language. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas using copying can show dependency.

Students often fail to connect literature with their own research area. Each study you reference should have a clear link to your objectives for your project.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

The most important results of the examination of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluators expect you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or if further research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies you may observe that most research focused on large organizations, while small firms were absent. The earlier studies also used secondary data, whereas primary data was not enough.

This gap is the basis for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your program could appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Each study covered must appear in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. A citation in text works better as it appears cleaner in an IGNOU MCOM project help ; Source Webpage, MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of their literature reviews should last. There isn't a set rule but for an for an mcom project, the length generally spans from fifteen to to two thousand words.

The length should be determined by the subject's complexity. A more broad subject requires more study, while a specific topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without any analysis doesn't increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A analyzed bank performance and discovered good results

Write in this manner
The author A conducted a research study on banking performance based on financial ratios. She concluded that profitability improved because of better asset administration. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B who highlighted the importance of operational efficiency in boosting returns for banks.

This approach emphasizes an understanding and analysis that is a must in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get rejected or delayed due to review of literature that has been copied. Although you may refer to previously published studies, the style is yours.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. If you are able, modify your content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou master of commerce project, make sure you read the entire literature review. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, if your flow follows logically and if the chapter is logically linked to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain the need for my study. If yes, your study's literature reviews are on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review to complete an ignou mcom research project is not easy at first especially for students returning to school after a long hiatus. But once you recognize that it is all about connection and analysis rather than memorization, the task becomes doable.

It is important to take time to read, think and write in your own voice. It is reflected clearly on your final product and often marks the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a powerful one.