How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For a lot of students studying at IGNOU reviewing books is the most confusing part of the assignment. This is particularly true for those who are working on the ignou master's degree project in which academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually feels limited. Students often ask if they require a summation of their books, amend journal articles, and simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and understanding that differences can affect the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not intended to be a record of how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the prior work on your field and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU evaluators look closely at this chapter because it reflects your ability to connect theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it important to be aware of the reason this particular chapter is required in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three main functions.

First, it shows that the topic you chose already has been explored and has a scholarly significance. In addition, it allows you to find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. Thirdly, it serves as an overview of your research objectives and methodology.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality, and take content from other projects or sources on the internet. This often results in negative marks or project rejection. IGNOU will require original content even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. But explaining in the simplest way is also discouraged. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review should reflect postgraduate knowledge.

You will be required to read books, research papers report, journals, and sometimes even government publications related to your subject. The attention should be focused on studies which are directly related to the area of your study.

As an example, if the project is on financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously concerning financial ratios performances of banks, profitability studies, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is choosing too many different sources. More important is quality than quantity. When it comes to an ignou mcom project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 strong sources are usually enough if they are well chosen.

Excellent sources include academic journals well-known books written by renowned authors RBI publication, reports from the government, and even university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always look for studies that are more recent especially those from the past 10 years. Older studies can be included in the event that they are fundamental in study.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of composing short summaries that are not organized, divide your literature reviews into sensible sections.

It is possible to organize the chapter using themes, period methods, or variables that are studied. For instance, one section might discuss studies on the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, while another focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you are not just copying content, you are actually analysing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be academic but simple. Avoid a lot of language and jargon. IGNOU prefers simplicity over clarity.

The study you are discussing should include the name of the author as well as the year of study, the methodological objective, the main findings. Be careful not to list them chronologically. Make an effort to link one study with a different one.

For instance, after discussing some study, you can refer to how an author's findings were supported or refuted these findings. This type of analysis adds greater depth to your project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One frequent error is writing the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like how accounting works or the meaning of management doesn't belong in this section unless it is directly connected to studies that have been done previously.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in yourself. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas copying demonstrates dependency.

They also fail to link the literature to their research subject. Every study you write about should have a clear connection your project objectives.

Connecting Literature Review with Research Gap

One of most important results of a review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU reviewers expect you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or where more research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies you'll notice that the majority of research focuses on large enterprises however small companies were unaddressed. And earlier studies used secondary data, whereas primary data was limited.

This gap becomes the justification for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your program could appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however quality is more important than consistency.

Each study must be mentioned in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Do not use footnotes for literature reviews. A citation in text works better as it appears cleaner in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long their literature reviews should last. There isn't a set rule and for an ignou mcom project, this chapter typically spans from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the subject's complexity. The more expansive topic requires more studies, while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A looked into the performance of banks and came up with positive results

Write it like this
This author conducted a study of banking performance using financial ratios and concluded that profitability increased thanks to better asset control. This result was later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the importance of operational efficiency in enhancing the bank's returns.

This strategy demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is a must in an MCOM IGNOU solved project - Highly recommended Website, project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get denied or delayed because of copies of literature reviews. Even if your reference is to previously published studies, the style ought to be uniquely yours.

Use plagiarism detection tools if you can and then rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is much better than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM assignment, you should read your literature review carefully. You should determine whether the research is relevant, if the flow of information is clear and if it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this section explain the reason for why I need to study it. If the answer is yes you're on the correct path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review as part of an ignou master's thesis may be daunting at first in particular for students who are returning to school after a long hiatus. When you understand that it's about connection and analysis, rather that memorization, the work becomes doable.

It is important to take time to read, think, and write in your personal voice. This is reflected on the final piece and often marks the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a solid one.