How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU review, reviewing literature is often the most difficult element of the project. This is especially the case for those who are working on an ignou-mcom project where academic depth is expected. However, guidance often feels a bit limited. Students usually inquire if they should summarize their books, amend journal articles, and simply gather quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding that the difference can impact the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not a report of how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate that you are knowledgeable about the available research on the topic you're studying and how your project fits in. IGNOU evaluators look closely at this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to connect theoretical concepts to research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is vital to understand the reason the section exists in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three principal purposes.

It first shows that the subject you have chosen is one that has been studied in the past and has academic relevance. Thirdly, it assists you detect gaps or deficiencies in previous studies. It also provides an outline for your studies' goals and research methodology.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from earlier projects or other sources online. This is a common practice that results in the project being rejected or not getting marks. IGNOU insists on original writing, even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. While doing so explaining in the simplest way is also discouraged. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review should reflect postgraduate knowledge.

You're required to read books, research papers journals, reports and sometimes even government publications related in your research topic. The attention should be focused on studies which are directly related to the area of your study.

In the case of example, if your task is to study the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you should examine earlier research that dealt with financial ratios, profitability analysis, banking performance, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is choosing too many different sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. When it comes to an IGNOU MCOM project report mcom project roughly fifteen to twenty sturdy sources is usually sufficient if they are well chosen.

Some good sources are academic journals well-known books written by renowned authors RBI papers, official reports and university level research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if they're foundational in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve quality of reading and impression. Instead of composing brief summaries on the fly, separate each literature overview into sensible sections.

You can structure the chapter based on themes, time period methodologies, or the variables to be studied. For instance, one section may focus on research studies related to the financial performance, while another may focus upon liquidity, while another one on operational efficiency.

This structure helps evaluators understand that you're more than just copying content but analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is to be professional but easy. Avoid using a lot of words and language. IGNOU prefers simplicity over clarity.

Every study you review should be accompanied by the name of the author, the year of study, the objective, methodology, as well as the main findings. Do not, however, list them chronologically. Try connecting one study with the other.

For example, after discussing one study, you may explain how another author's work supported or disputed those findings. This kind of approach can add richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to write the literature review in the form of an academic chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like how accounting works or the meaning of management doesn't belong here unless directly linked to earlier studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your review of literature should be written in individual words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while writing in a copy shows dependency.

Many students do not connect sources to their own research topic. Any study you discuss must have a clear connection the goals of your project.

Connection of Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main outcomes of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU reviewers expect you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or where more research is required.

In a discussion of multiple studies it's possible that research focused on large firms while smaller companies were overlooked. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data but primary information was scarce.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your an ignou project. Without it, your project will appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however the consistency is more important than perfection.

Each study mentioned must be listed in the list of references at the end of the project. References that are not included raise doubts about authenticity.

Don't use footnotes to review literature. In-text citations are more efficient and appears more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the literature review should last. There is no set amount that can be followed, however for an MCOM project, this chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred in length to 2500 words.

The length should be determined by topic complexity. A topic that is more extensive requires additional research while a focussed topic requires less but deeper discussions.

Writing lengthy reviews that are not needed without analysis is not going to improve your marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A did a thorough study of the performance of banks and came up with positive results

Write like this
For example, author A conducted a research study on bank performance using financial ratios, and found that profitability improved because of improved asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the importance of operational efficiency in improving bank profits.

This strategy demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get stopped or rejected because of plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if you reference earlier studies, the language ought to be uniquely yours.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. You can also rewrite your content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM project, reread the literature review carefully. Make sure that each study is relevant, if the flow of the study is coherent and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear the reasons why my study is required. If yes it's on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature to complete an ignou mcom research project may initially be challenging especially for those who return to academics after a gap. When you understand that it's about connection and analysis, rather than memorization, the task is manageable.

It is important to take time to read, think, and write in your unique voice. That effort reflects clearly in the final draft and often makes the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a high-quality one.