How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students who are enrolled in IGNOU MCOM project writing services - check out this one from Dveri 25 - and IGNOU, the study of literature is often the most difficult section of the work. This is especially the case in the case of an ignou-mcom project where academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually appears to be limited. Students frequently ask if they are required to summarize books or make journal articles more readable, or simply gather quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding that difference can change the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not intended to demonstrate how much information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend prior work on the topic you're researching and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter since it showcases your ability to connect theoretical concepts to research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it must be understood why this chapter is essential to an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three essential functions.

First, it shows that the topic you chose has been researched before and has academic significance. Second, it helps you identify gaps or limitations in prior research. Thirdly, it gives you an outline for your research objectives and your methodology.

Many students see this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or from online sources. This typically results in failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU will require original content even when discussing existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. On the other hand the use of very basic explanations is being discouraged. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

It is expected that you read research papers, books, journals, reports, and sometimes government publications related with your field. The concentration should be on the studies that directly pertain to your research field.

If, for instance, your project focuses on the financial health of banks Your literature review should examine earlier research on financial ratios, profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One of the most common mistakes students make is to select too many irrelevant sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. If you are looking to build an ignou mcom business between 15 and 20 good sources can be found when they're well-chosen.

Academic journals are a good option, reputed books by known writers, RBI books, public reports and university level research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

Always look for studies that are more recent particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. These older studies may be included only if they are foundational in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

An organized chapter improves readability and impression. Instead of composing random summaries and essays, you should divide all the reviews of books into clear sections.

The chapter can be organized based on themes, time period as well as the methodology or variables investigated. For instance, one section may focus on research studies related to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, and another concerning operational efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding the difference between copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing must be formal but not abrasive. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary vocabulary. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Each study you analyze should be listed with the author's name, year of study, methodological objective, the main findings. Be careful not to list them mechanically. Try to connect one study with another.

For instance, when discussing the findings of one study, you could highlight how another author's study supported or refuted the findings. This method of comparison adds richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review like the textbook chapter. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like understanding of accounting's definition or of management doesn't belong in this section unless it is directly connected to previous studies.

Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in Your own voice. This shows your understanding. writing in a copy shows dependency.

They are also often unable to link study findings to their own topics. Each study you discuss should be clearly linked to your research objectives.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key outcomes of reviewing the literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU evaluations expect you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or indicate where additional research is needed.

After discussing multiple studies, you'll notice that the majority of research focused on large firms however small companies were unaddressed. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, but primary data was not enough.

This gap serves as the rationale for your an ignou project. Without it, your project could appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but quality is more important than consistency.

Each study must be mentioned in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. In text citation works better and looks cleaner in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the reviews of books should run. There isn't a set rule in the case of an ignou MCOM project, the chapter usually ranges between fifteen hundred up to two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the complexity of the topic. A topic that is more extensive requires more study, while a specific topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analysis does not improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A has studied the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write it like this
For example, author A performed a study examining bank performance by using financial ratios. The study found that profitability improved thanks to better asset control. This was later validated by Author B who pointed out the role of operational efficiency in improving returns to banks.

This approach displays the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is appreciated in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are rejected or delayed due to copied literature reviews. If you do refer to previous research, the language has to be distinctly yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking software if possible. Then, rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM task, revisit the review of literature carefully. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, whether you can follow the logic of the review and whether the chapter leads naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this section explain the reasons why my study is required. If the answer is yes it's on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review for a ignou mcom project isn't easy at first particularly for students returning to university after a gap. If you can realize that it's about analysis and connection rather than recitation, the challenge becomes manageable.

Read, think and write with your own voice. Your effort is evident into the final version of your work. This often the difference is between an average project and a solid one.