How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

In the case of many students at IGNOU reviews of literature is often the most difficult component of their project. This is particularly true in the case of an ignou mcom assignment, where academic rigor is expected but guidance often isn't clear. Students usually ask whether they are required to summarize books or revise journal articles, or simply gather quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that difference can change the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not a document that demonstrates how much of the literature you've read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the existing work related to your topic and how your work fits in. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to connect the theory and research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it is crucial to comprehend why this chapter is necessary in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three main goals.

First, it demonstrates that the subject you have chosen is one that has been studied in the past and has academic relevance. In addition, it allows you to find gaps or weaknesses in previous studies. Thirdly, it establishes an understanding of research goals and the methodology.

Many students take this chapter as a formality and copy content from earlier projects or sources on the internet. This can result in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU will require original content even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. But, very basic explanations are not permitted. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project the literature review will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

You're required to read research papers, books journals, reports, and sometimes government publications related to your topic. The emphasis should be placed on studies related to your research field.

In this case, for example, if your project is focusing on the financial performance of banks and banks, then your literature search should include earlier studies on financial ratios, financial performance, profitability analysis and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. More important is quality than quantity. For an ignou mcom project anywhere between fifteen and twenty good sources can be found as long as they're carefully chosen.

Good sources include academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned creators, RBI publications, federal reports and university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always pick studies from recent years, ideally from the last 10 years. Older studies can be included only if they are foundational in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves understanding and perception. Instead of composing random summaries, break up this literature summary into clear sections.

You may organize the chapter according to themes, time period methods, or variables researched. For example, one section could discuss research related to profitability, whereas another might focus on liquidity while the other regarding operational efficiency.

This format helps evaluaters understand that you're more than just taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be academic but simple. Avoid overly complicated language and terminology. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Each study that you talk about must include the author's name, year of study, goal, methodology, and major findings. Do not, however, list them in a formal manner. Try connecting one study with another.

For instance, when discussing one study, you could explain how another author's work supported and/or refuted the findings. This method of comparison adds an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to compose the literature review like a textbook chapter. Basic concepts such as definition of accounting or meaning of management does not belong in this section unless it is directly connected in previous studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your review of literature should be written in individual words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while writing in a copy shows dependency.

Students should also make sure to link books to their own research study. Every study you reference must be clearly connected to the research goals.

Establishing a linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of most important outcomes of reviewing the literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU MCOM project topics (www.5giay.vn) reviewers expect you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or indicate areas where further research is required.

When you look over a range of studies you'll find that a lot of studies were focused on large businesses but small companies were not considered. And earlier studies used secondary data, however primary data was scarce.

This is a reason for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your plan could appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but it is more about consistency than perfection.

Each study mentioned must be listed in the reference list at the end of the project. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. Citation in text is more effective as it appears cleaner in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the writing review must run. There's no set timeframe to follow, but for an assignment in mcom, this chapter typically ranges from fifteen hundred in length to 2500 words.

The length should be determined by the complexity of the topic. For a broad topic, you will need more studies, while a particular topic will require fewer, but more in-depth discussions.

Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A looked into the performance of banks and came up with positive results

Write it like this
An author conducted research on the performance of banks based on financial ratios. She found that profitability improved because of better asset management. This was later validated by Author B who highlighted the importance of operation efficiency in improving bank profitability.

This approach is based on understanding and analysis, which is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are stopped or rejected because of copy-pasted literature reviews. If you do refer to previous studies, the language is yours.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible. Rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting an ignou mcom project, read the entire literature review. Verify that each research is relevant, if the flow of information is clear and if the chapters naturally connect to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason why my study is needed. If the answer is yes, that literature study is in the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou project may feel challenging at first especially for those who return to school after a break. If you can realize that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorization, the project is easy to handle.

Make time to read, think, and write in your personal voice. This effort will be evident on your final product and often can be the difference in two submissions: a standard one and a strong one.