How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

There are many students who enroll in IGNOU reviews of literature can be the most complicated section of the work. This is particularly true for those working on IGNOU's mcom projects, where academic rigor is expected but guidance often can be difficult to find. Students usually ask if have to write a summary of books, make journal articles more readable, or simply take notes of quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that a difference could affect the overall quality of the project.

A literature review is not intended to demonstrate how much content you've read. It is written to show how well you comprehend literature that is relevant to your subject and how your research fits into it. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link concepts with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it is vital to understand the reason the section exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three essential functions.

It first shows that the topic you selected has been extensively studied and has academic significance. Second, it helps you find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. Thirdly it helps you establish the basis for your research objectives and methodological.

Students often view this chapter as a formality, and take content from other assignments or other online sources. This can result in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU requires original work even when discussing existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. On the other hand explaining in the simplest way is too much to be avoided. For an ignou MCOM project, the review of literature should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You're expected review books, research papers and reports, as well as journals and even government publications pertaining to your field of study. The focus should be on studies that directly link to your research field.

If, for instance, your project focuses on the financial health of banks and banks, then your literature search must focus on earlier research dealing with financial ratios performances of banks, profitability studies and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One mistake that students often make is to select too many irrelevant sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For an ignou mcom project anywhere between fifteen and twenty high-quality sources are often enough when they're well-chosen.

An excellent source of information is academic journals and reputable books written by well-known the authors RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, and university level research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies especially those from the past 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered in the event that they are fundamental in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well organized chapter improves the readability and impact. Instead of composing short summaries that are not organized, divide an overview of literature into clear sections.

You can organize the chapter around themes, a time period and methodology or even variables to be studied. For instance, one section could focus on studies related the financial performance, while another may focus upon liquidity, while another focus on efficiency in operations.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you're more than just copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be academic but simple. Beware of a long, rambling style and unnecessary jargon. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Each study you discuss should be listed with the author's name, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as most important results. It is not necessary to list them in a linear manner. Make an effort to link one study with the other.

If you're discussing your findings from one study, be able to mention that another author's findings backed or opposed those findings. The comparative approach adds more richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to compose the literature review like the textbook chapter. It is important to clarify the basic concepts, such as definition of accounting or the significance of management isn't appropriate in this section unless it is directly connected to prior studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written in one's own terms. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying shows dependence.

Students often fail to connect the literature to their research topic. Any study you discuss must be clearly connected to the goals of your project.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key result of reviewing literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU reviewers expect you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or where more research is required.

After reviewing a number of studies, it's possible that studies centered on large organizations, while small firms were overlooked. Some studies have used secondary data, however primary data was not as extensive.

This gap is the basis for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your plan could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however the consistency is more important than perfection.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the reference list at the end of the Project Report IGNOU MCOM. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. A citation in text works better and appears better in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the length of their review on literature ought to run. There's no definitive rule that can be followed, however for an MCOM project, the chapter usually ranges between fifteen hundred -two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on topics' complexity. The more expansive topic requires more research, while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A conducted a study of the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write it like this
The author A conducted a study about banking performance using financial ratios. They concluded that profitability increased thanks to better asset control. This was later validated by Author B who highlighted the role of operating efficiency in boosting bank earnings.

This approach is based on the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is considered important in an ignou mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are rejected or delayed due to copied literature reviews. Even if you cite prior studies, the language is yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking software if feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom project, go back through the literature review attentively. Verify that each research is relevant, whether your flow follows logically, and whether the chapter leads naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this section explain the reason why my research is important. If yes then you're on the correct path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review for an ignou project is not easy at first, especially for students returning to academics after a gap. If you can realize that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorizing, the job is manageable.

Spend time reading, think and write in your unique voice. This is reflected in your final product and often marks the difference between the average submission and a solid one.