How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

In the case of many students at IGNOU, the review of literature becomes the most confusing aspect of their project. This is particularly true for those who are working on an ignou project for mcom, where academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually can be difficult to find. Students usually inquire if they are required to summarize books or modify journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that difference can change the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not a document that demonstrates how much of the literature you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you understand the existing work related to the topic you're studying and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU evaluators look closely at this chapter as it shows your ability to link theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it is crucial to consider the reasons this chapter is essential to an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three main goals.

It first shows that the subject you have chosen has been studied earlier and has a scientific significance. It also helps you identify gaps or limitations in earlier research. Thirdly, it establishes the basis for your research objectives and methodology.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality, and copy content from earlier assignments or other online sources. This typically results in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU does not require original writing in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. However any explanation that is not basic is as well discouraged. In the case of an IGNOU MCOM project help - link homepage, mcom assignment, the review of literature will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

You're required to read books, research papers journal articles, reports, and sometimes, government publications related to your topic. The concentration should be on the studies related to your research topic.

For instance, if your project focuses on the financial health of banks If so, your literature analysis should examine earlier research related to financial ratios, banking performance, profitability analysis and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. When it comes to an ignou mcom project between 15 and 20 sturdy sources is usually sufficient as long as they're carefully chosen.

Good sources include academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous authors, RBI documents, Government reports and university level research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always pick studies from recent years at least from the last ten years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if they're of a fundamental in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized and organized chapter enhances readership and impression. Instead of writing brief summaries on the fly, separate your literature reviews into clear sections.

You may organize the chapter by themes, time period, methodology, or variables researched. For example, one section may focus on research studies related to profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity, and yet another focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure aids in understanding that you're not copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is academic, but simple. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary use of jargon. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.

Each study you analyze should include the name of its author, the year of study, the methodological objective, the main findings. However, do not list them in a formal manner. Try to connect one research to another.

When you've discussed one study, you may be able to mention that another author's findings backed or refuted the findings. This approach of comparing studies adds depth to your ignou MCOM project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review in the form of the textbook chapter. In explaining the basics of concepts like the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management is not a good idea in this section unless it is directly connected to other studies.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in yourself. Reading from the source shows understanding, and using copying can show dependency.

Students often fail to connect works to their research topic. Every study you write about should have a clear link to the goals of your project.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of important outcomes of a review of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU evaluations expect you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or the areas in which further research is required.

After looking over several studies, it's possible that research focused on large organizations however small companies were ignored. Some studies have used secondary data, while primary data was scarce.

This is why it's the main reason for your project in the ignou mcom. Without it, your program could appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature It is vital to have a correct citation. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Each study must be mentioned in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Do not use footnotes for literature reviews. In text citations work better and is cleaner when used in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the literature review should last. There isn't a set rule to follow, but for an MCOM project this chapter generally ranges from fifteen hundred to two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on topics' complexity. A broader topic requires more studies, while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.

Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A studied banking's performance and obtained good results

Write it like this
An author conducted an investigation on the performance of banks based on financial ratios. She concluded that profitability increased because of better asset management. This was later validated by Author B, who emphasized the role played by the efficiency of operations in enhancing bank returns.

This approach emphasizes understanding and analysis, which is essential to an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get deferred or even rejected due to plagiarism in literature reviews. If you do refer to previous studies, the terminology you use must reflect the original.

Use plagiarism checking tools if possible. You can also rewrite your content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom task, revisit the review carefully. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, if your flow follows logically and if the chapters flow naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain the reason for why I need to study it. If the answer is yes, then it's on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for a ignou mcom project can be a challenge at first Particularly for students returning to school after a long hiatus. However, once you realize that it is more about analysis and connecting than memorizing, the job becomes manageable.

Make time to read, think, and write in your personal voice. It is reflected clearly on the final piece and often the difference is between one that is average and a strong one.