How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

In the case of many students at IGNOU The review of books is the most confusing part of the project work. This is especially true for students working on the ignou mcom course, where academic depth is expected but guidance often appears to be limited. Students usually ask if should summarize their books, make journal articles more readable, or simply gather quotes. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that a difference could affect the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not written to reveal how much information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend current research related to your area of study and how your project fits within it. IGNOU evaluators look closely at the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to connect ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it is crucial to understand why this chapter is necessary in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three primary functions.

In the first place, it indicates that the topic you selected has been extensively studied and has academic significance. In addition, it allows you to identify any gaps or limitations from earlier research. The third is that it creates an outline for your research objectives and methodological.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from their previous projects or online sources. This is a common practice that results in small marks or project failure. IGNOU insists on original writing, even when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. Additionally it is recommended that students write in a simple way. as well discouraged. For an ignou master's degree project the literature review must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

You'll be expected to read research papers, books or reports, journals as well as government publications that are related with your field. The emphasis should be placed on studies that directly link to your area of study.

In the case of example, if your research is focused on the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis will focus on prior studies concerning financial ratios efficiency of banks, profitability analyses, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is choosing too many different sources. It's more about quality than quantity. For an ignou-mcom project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 high-quality sources are often enough if they are well chosen.

Some good sources are academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous the authors RBI publishing, state reports and even university research papers. Websites with unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always look for studies that are more recent and ideally, from the last ten years. The older studies may be included only if they're fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter enhances perception and readability. Instead of writing random summaries, you can divide this literature summary into logical sections.

You can structure the chapter by theme, time period and methodology or even variables examined. For instance, one section may examine studies that pertain to profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity, and another regarding operational efficiency.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you're not simply copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid a lot of language and jargon. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Each research study you write about should include the name of its author, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as the major findings. However, don't list them in a logical manner. Try connecting one study with the other.

For instance, when discussing one study, you may mention how another author supported or opposed those findings. This type of analysis adds complexity to your IGNOU MCOM project submission guide (proxy-tu.researchport.umd.edu) project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review in the form of it is a textbook chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like understanding of accounting's definition or of management isn't appropriate in this section unless it is directly connected to prior studies.

Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written in an individual way. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while the copying of your review shows dependency.

Students are also prone to not linking study findings to their own focus. Each study you discuss should be in a direct connection to your research goals.

Connection of Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the major outcomes of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU examiners expect you explain what the previous researchers missed or the areas in which further research is needed.

In the course of discussing several studies it is possible to observe that the majority studies were focused on large businesses in contrast to small businesses being unaddressed. Or that earlier studies used secondary data while primary data were not sufficient.

This gap becomes the justification for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, the project might appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally follows APA style, but consistency matters more than perfection.

Every study to be discussed must be included in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.

Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. In text citation works better and is cleaner when used in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of an essay on literature should last. There is no fixed rule but, for an ignou for an mcom project, the length typically ranges from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the level of complexity of the topic. A more broad subject requires more research. A specific topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without analysis is not going to improve your marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A has studied banking performance and found good results

Write as such
In the year A, Author B conducted a research study on the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study concluded that profitability improved thanks to better asset control. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the role played by operational efficiency in improving returns for banks.

This approach displays understanding and analysis, which is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are rejected or delayed due to the use of copied literature reviews. If you do refer to prior studies, the language has to be distinctly yours.

Use plagiarism checking tools if possible and rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou project, reread the literature review attentively. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, whether it flows in a logical manner, and whether the chapter flows naturally towards your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the need for my study. If yes, your review on literature will be in the best path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review for an ignou mcom project can be a challenge at first especially for those who return to school after a break. When you realize it's more about connecting and analysis than memorization of information, the task is a lot easier.

It is important to take time to read, think, and write in your own voice. It is reflected clearly in the final project and can make the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. impressive one.