How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For a lot of students studying at IGNOU review, reviewing literature can be the most complicated component of their project. This is especially the case in the case of the ignou master's degree project where academic rigor is expected but guidance often appears to be limited. Students usually ask if are required to summarize books or edit journal articles, or simply gather quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that differences can affect the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is NOT written to illustrate how much information you've read. It's written to demonstrate that you are knowledgeable about the previous work that pertains to your field and how your project is integrated into it. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter as it shows your ability to link the theory and research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, important to be aware of the reason this chapter exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three major purposes.

First, it shows that the topic you chose has been researched before and has a scholarly significance. Thirdly, it assists you detect gaps or deficiencies in earlier studies. Third, it provides an outline of your research objectives and methodological.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality, and copy content from earlier projects or sources on the internet. This can result in negative marks or project rejection. IGNOU will require original content even when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. But, very basic explanations are discouraged. For an ignou mcom project the literature review should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You'll be expected to read research papers, books, journals, reports, and occasionally, government publications that relate to your research area. The emphasis should be placed on studies related to your area of study.

In this case, for example, if your project focuses on the financial health of banks and banks, then your literature search should focus on prior research that dealt with financial ratios, banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is choosing too many different sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. For an IGNOU MCOM project report mcom project anywhere between fifteen and twenty solid sources are typically enough If they're chosen with care.

Academic journals are a good option popular books written by well-known the authors RBI publications, federal reports and university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies, ideally from the last 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they're foundational in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well organized chapter improves comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of composing random summaries, you can divide your literature reviews into logical sections.

The chapter could be structured by themes, time period as well as the methodology or variables researched. For instance, one chapter might focus on studies that relate to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity while the other focus on efficiency in operations.

This structure assists evaluators to understand the difference between copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is academic, but simple. Avoid excessive language and language. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Each study that you talk about must include the author's name, year of study, goal, methodology, and the main findings. However, do not list them mechanically. Try connecting one study with a different one.

When you've discussed one study, you may explain how another author's work supported or challenged those findings. This type of analysis adds depth to your ignou MCOM project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review in the form of an academic chapter. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like what accounting is and the meaning of management are not needed in this section unless it is directly connected to studies that have been done previously.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your literature review should be written in your own words. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying indicates dependence.

They are also often unable to link studies to their own research study. Every study you write about should have a clear connection with your project objectives.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

The most important results of the examination of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU evaluations expect you to explain what the previous researchers missed or the areas where more study is needed.

In the course of discussing several studies it is possible to observe that the majority research focused on large firms and small businesses were ignored. In the past, studies utilized secondary data, whereas primary data was limited.

This void is the reason for your projects ignou.com. Without it, your program could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but quality is more important than consistency.

Each research study should be included in the list of references at the end of the study. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.

Don't use footnotes to review literature. A text-based citation is more efficient as it appears cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long their literature reviews should be. There's no standard rule but, for an ignou MCOM project, the chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred up to two thousand words.

The length should be determined by your topic's complexity. A broad topic will require the most research, whereas a focussed topic requires less but more in-depth discussions.

Reviewing unnecessarily long without analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
The author analyzed banking's performance and obtained good results

Write this in the same way as
This author performed a study examining banking performance with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased through better asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role of operational efficiency when it comes to improving returns to banks.

This approach displays the ability to analyze and comprehend, which can be valued in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get refused or delayed because of copy-pasted literature reviews. Even if the reference is to previous studies, the language ought to be uniquely yours.

Use plagiarism checking tools if feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is much better than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM assignment, you should read the literature review carefully. Check whether each study is relevant, whether the flow is rational and if it is linked naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain why my study is needed. If yes, that literature study is in the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou project may feel challenging at first Particularly for students returning into academics after a time off. If you can realize that it's about analysis and connections rather than memorization, the project becomes manageable.

Make time to read, consider, and write in your unique voice. It is reflected clearly in the final work. It can make the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. high-quality one.