How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

Many students taking part in IGNOU studying research becomes the most confusing component of their project. This is especially the case for students working on the IGNOU MCOM Project Writing mcom course, where academic rigor is expected. However, guidance often feels a bit limited. Students usually ask if require a summation of their books, refret journal articles or simply gather quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that differences can affect the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not a document that demonstrates how much information you've read. It is written to show how well you comprehend the current work in relation to your field and how your project fits within it. IGNOU examiners examine this chapter due to your ability to connect theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it is essential to know why this chapter is necessary in an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three main goals.

It first shows that the subject you chose is one that has been studied in the past as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Furthermore, it will help you discern gaps or deficiencies in previous studies. The third is that it creates an outline for your research objectives and your methodology.

Many students see this chapter as a formality, and duplicate content from previous projects or other sources online. This is a common practice that results in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when discussing existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. At the same time any explanation that is not basic is prohibited. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.

You're expected to study books, research papers report, journals, and sometimes even government publications related to your research area. The primary focus should be on research relevant to your area of study.

In the case of example, if your project focuses on the financial health of banks Your literature review should include earlier studies dealing with financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. It's more about quality than quantity. For an ignou-mcom project about fifteen to twenty quality sources are usually sufficient as long as they're carefully chosen.

Some good sources are academic journals highly regarded books by well-known authors, RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, and university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always look for studies that are more recent especially those from the past ten years. The older studies may be included only if they're fundamental in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve perception and readability. Instead of composing random summaries, divide sections of the review in sensible sections.

You may organize the chapter by theme, time period research methodology, or other variables that are studied. For instance, one chapter may focus on research studies related to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity and another focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you're not simply copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be academic but simple. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary use of jargon. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.

Each study you discuss should include the name of its author, the year of study, the research objectives, methods, and most important results. But, don't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Make an effort to link one study with another.

If you're discussing one study, you could write about how a different author's research supported the results or countered them. This comparative approach adds an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review like the kind of chapter in a textbook. In explaining the basics of concepts like the definition of accounting or the meaning of management are not needed in this article unless they are directly linked to previous research.

Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written by you in individual words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying shows dependency.

Many students do not connect the literature to their research subject. Every study you write about should have a clear link to your project objectives.

Links Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most important result of reviewing literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluations expect you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or where more research is needed.

After having discussed a myriad of studies it is possible to observe that the majority studies were focused on large businesses, while small firms were left out. And earlier studies used secondary data, while primary data was scarce.

This gap can be the motivation for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your program could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however quality is more important than consistency.

Each study must be mentioned in the reference list at the end of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. A text-based citation is more efficient and appears better in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the literature review should run. There's no standard rule however, for an ignou MCOM project, the length of this chapter typically ranges from fifteen hundred up to two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the complexity of the topic. A broader topic requires more research. A narrowly focused subject requires less but deeper discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A conducted a study of bank performance and discovered good results

Write this way
In the year A, Author B conducted research on the performance of banks using financial ratios. They found that profitability improved due to improved asset management. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the role of operating efficiency in boosting the bank's returns.

This approach reflects an understanding and analysis that is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get stopped or rejected because of copy-pasted literature reviews. Even if you cite previous studies, the language must be your own.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. Then, rewrite the content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is superior to copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom project, reread your literature review carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, whether the flow is consistent and whether the chapter naturally leads to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes, then you're on the correct path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou MCOM project may be daunting at first especially for students returning to college after a long absence. However, once you realize that it is about connection and analysis, rather than recitation, the challenge becomes easier to manage.

Do your best to read, consider, and write with your own voice. Your effort is evident into the final version of your work. This often makes the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. high-quality one.