How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students enrolled in IGNOU, the review of literature can be the most elusive part of the project work. This is especially true for students working on an ignou mcom assignment, where academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually isn't available. Students often ask if they need to summarize books, amend journal articles, and simply gather quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not a document that demonstrates how much content you've read. It is written to show how well you comprehend the literature that is relevant to the topic you're researching and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU assessors scrutinize this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, however, it important to be aware of the reason the section exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature reviews serve three main purposes.

It first shows that the subject you chose has been previously studied and has academic significance. Second, it helps you discover gaps or issues in earlier studies. In addition, it can provide an overview of your research goals and methods.

A lot of students view this chapter as a formality, and take content from other assignments or other online sources. This practice usually leads to poor marks or even project rejection. IGNOU expects original writing even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. In the same way explaining in the simplest way is being discouraged. For an ignou master's degree project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

It is expected that you read books, research papers, journals, reports, and occasionally, government publications that relate in your research topic. The attention should be focused on studies relevant to your research field.

For example, if you study is about the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously in relation to financial ratios financial performance, profitability analysis and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For a project in ignou roughly fifteen to twenty sturdy sources is usually sufficient when they're well-chosen.

These are good sources for academic journals highly regarded books by well-known writers, RBI publishing, state reports as well as university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies that are from the last ten years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they're fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter increases understanding and perception. Instead of composing random summaries of the work, break down this literature summary into clear sections.

It is possible to organize the chapter using themes, period techniques, methodologies, or variables investigated. For example, one section might focus on studies that relate to profit, while another could concentrate upon liquidity, while another focus on efficiency in operations.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you're not taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is to be professional but easy. Avoid a lot of language and vocabulary. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.

Each study that you talk about must include the name of its author, the year of study, the objective, methodology, as well as important findings. However, don't list them mechanically. Make sure to connect one study with a different one.

For example, after analyzing an article, you can explain how another author's work supported or challenged those findings. This kind of approach can add depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review like the kind of chapter in a textbook. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like understanding of accounting's definition or of management are not needed here unless directly linked to earlier studies.

Another error is overquoting. Your literature review should be written by you in you own language. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying demonstrates dependency.

Students are also prone to not linking publications to their personal research topic. Any study you discuss must be clearly linked to your research goals.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key result of reviewing literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU evaluations expect you to identify what earlier researchers didn't know or the areas where more study is required.

After discussing multiple studies, you'll notice that the majority of research focused on large organizations, while small firms were unaddressed. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, while primary data were not sufficient.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your project in the ignou mcom. Without it, your program could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but quality is more important than consistency.

Each study mentioned must be listed in the reference list at the end of the study. Any missing references cast doubt on the authenticity.

Don't use footnotes to review literature. A citation in text works better and appears more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the length of their review on literature ought to last. There is no fixed rule and for an ignou MCOM project, the length of this chapter typically ranges from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length should depend on your topic's complexity. A broader topic requires more research, while a particular topic will require fewer, but deeper discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analysis is not going to improve your marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A researched the bank's performance and got good results

Write this way
This author carried out a study on banking performance using financial ratios and found that profitability improved by a better management of assets. This result was later confirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the importance of the efficiency of operations in enhancing bank profits.

This type of approach shows understanding and analysis, which is valued in an IGNOU MCOM project topics [https://akkrafts.com/how-to-write-an-m-com-project-for-ignou-university-4] MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are cancelled or delayed due the use of copied literature reviews. Even if the reference is to other studies, your language will have to match your own.

Use plagiarism checking tools as possible. You can also rewrite your content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Prior to submitting your ignou mcom project, go back through the review of literature carefully. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, if the flow is logical and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the reason why my research is important. If yes your study's literature reviews are on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou project may feel challenging at first, especially for students returning back to their academics after a period of. But once you understand that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorization of information, the task becomes doable.

Be sure to read, think, and write in your own voice. This effort will be evident into the final version of your work. This often the difference is between two submissions: a standard one and a outstanding one.