How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

In the case of many students at IGNOU The review of books is the most confusing part of the assignment. This is especially true for those who are working on an ignou mcom assignment, where academic rigor is expected, yet guidance frequently seems to be a little sluggish. Students generally ask whether they must write summaries of books, revise journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding how different approaches can impact the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is NOT written to illustrate how much you've read. It is written to show how well you comprehend the current work in relation to the subject you are researching and how your project fits in. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to connect knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it is crucial to comprehend why this chapter is necessary in an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three main goals.

It first shows that the topic you chose has been studied earlier and has relevance to academic research. Thirdly, it assists you identify any gaps or limitations from earlier research. It also provides an overview of your research goals and the methodology.

Many students see this chapter as a formality and duplicate content from previous assignments or other online sources. This approach usually results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU insists on original writing, even when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. On the other hand it is recommended that students write in a simple way. too much to be avoided. For an ignou MCOM project, the review of literature must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

You're expected review research papers, books journals, reports, and sometimes government publications related to your research area. The primary focus should be on research which are directly related to your research area.

In this case, for example, if your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks So, your literature reviews must focus on earlier research about financial ratios performances of banks, profitability studies, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. For an ignou mcom project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 reliable sources will suffice provided they are selected with care.

Academic journals are a good option reliable books from well-known writer, RBI books, public reports and university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies which are typically from the last 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they're fundamental in nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve readership and impression. Instead of writing random summaries, break up this literature summary into logical sections.

It is possible to organize the chapter around themes, a time period and methodology or even variables examined. For example, one section may cover studies related profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity, and another concerning operational efficiency.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you are not just copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style must be formal but not abrasive. Avoid dense language and excessive vocabulary. IGNOU values clarity over complexity.

Each study you present should include the name of the author, year of study, objective, methodology, and main findings. Don't mention the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Try connecting one study with another.

For example, after analyzing some study, you can be able to mention that another author's findings backed or refuted the findings. This kind of approach can add greater depth to your project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review like the kind of chapter in a textbook. Simply explaining concepts such as the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management isn't appropriate in this article unless they are directly linked to other studies.

Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written in the style of your personal words. In the end, paraphrasing is an indication of understanding, while the copying of your review shows dependency.

Many students do not connect books to their own research focus. Every study you write about should have a clear link to your research objectives.

Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap

The most important result of reviewing literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to explain what the previous researchers missed or where more research is required.

When you look over a range of studies you'll see that most research focused on large organizations, while small firms were ignored. The earlier studies also used secondary data while primary data was not enough.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project may appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however quality is more important than consistency.

Each study must be mentioned in the list of references at the end of the study. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. The in-text citation is better and looks cleaner in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the reviews of books should be. There's no rule of thumb in the case of an ignou MCOM project, the chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred up to two thousand words.

The length should depend on the level of complexity of the topic. For a broad topic, you will need more research. A focussed topic requires less but more in-depth discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance, and found positive results

Create this type of writing
This author conducted a study about banking performance using financial ratios and concluded that profitability increased through better asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B who pointed out the role of operational efficiency when it comes to improving the bank's returns.

This approach emphasizes an understanding and analysis that is valued in an ignou mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get denied or delayed because of copy-pasted literature reviews. Even if your reference is to prior studies, the language you use must reflect the original.

Use plagiarism checking tools if possible. If you are able, modify your content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is superior to copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou MCOM IGNOU solved project (4wd-svs-russia.ru) project, reread the review carefully. You should determine whether the research is relevant, whether the flow is logical, and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason the reason why my research is important. If the answer is yes, your review on literature will be in the best path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature to complete an ignou mcom research project could be daunting at first particularly for students who are returning to academics following a gap. But once you know that it is more about analysis and connecting than recitation, the challenge can be accomplished.

It is important to take time to read, think, and write in your own voice. Your effort is evident on the final piece and often marks the difference between the average submission and a impressive one.