How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students who are enrolled in IGNOU and IGNOU, the study of literature can be the most confusing portion of their work. This is particularly true for those who are working on an ignou mcom project, in which academic depth is expected, yet guidance frequently isn't clear. Students usually ask if should summarize their books, amend journal articles, and simply gather quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that difference can change the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not written to show the quantity of information you've read. It is written to show how well you comprehend the prior work on the topic of your choice and how you work fits in. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter as it shows your ability to connect concepts with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it important to be aware of the reason this chapter exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three essential functions.

It first shows it is clear that the topic you've chosen has been researched before and has academic relevance. Thirdly, it assists you find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. Thirdly, it gives you an understanding of studies' goals and research methodology.

Students often view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from their previous assignments or other online sources. This typically results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. But, very basic explanations are also not recommended. In an ignou project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.

You are expected to review books, research papers or reports, journals and sometimes even government publications related to your research area. The emphasis should be placed on studies that directly connect with your area of study.

As an example, if the research is focused on the financial performance of banks Then your literature review will focus on prior studies that dealt with financial ratios, the performance of banks, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake made by students is choosing too many different sources. More important is quality than quantity. In the case of an ignou MCOM project about fifteen to twenty quality sources are usually sufficient for a good selection.

These are good sources for academic journals and reputable books written by well-known writers, RBI papers, official reports and university level research papers. Websites that lack clarity on the author should be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent particularly those that have been published in the last ten years. Some older studies are acceptable only if they're fundamental in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve quality of reading and impression. Instead of composing short summaries that are not organized, divide each literature overview into clear sections.

You may organize the chapter around themes, a time period techniques, methodologies, or variables examined. For example, one section might discuss studies on profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity, and yet another focus on efficiency in operations.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you're more than just copying content but analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be simple but academic. Avoid excessive language and language. IGNOU prefers simplicity over clarity.

Each research study you write about should include the author name, year of study, objective, methodology, and major findings. But, don't list them in a formal manner. Try connecting one study with a different one.

For instance, when discussing some research, you might mention how another author supported the results or countered them. This type of analysis adds depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

An error that is often made is to write the literature review as a textbook chapter. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like what accounting is and the meaning of management is not appropriate in this section unless it is directly connected to previous research.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your literature review should be written in you own language. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas copying implies dependence.

Many students do not connect the literature to their research focus. Every study you reference must have a clear connection the research goals.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of most important outcomes of reviewing the literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU assessors require you to show what earlier researchers missed or indicate where additional research is needed.

In the course of discussing several studies you'll notice that the majority of studies focus on large organisations but small companies were disregarded. And earlier studies used secondary data, but primary data was not enough.

This void is the reason for your ignou mcom project. Without this, your project could appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.

Each study covered must appear in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. Any missing references cast doubt on the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes when reviewing literature. A text-based citation is more efficient and appears cleaner in an IGNOU MCOM project report, domsd.ru, MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the review of literature must run. There's no rule of thumb but for an MCOM project, the chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred or two thousand words.

The length should depend on topic complexity. For a broad topic, you will need greater research, whereas a specific topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without an analysis won't help marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A studied banking performance and found good results

Write this in the same way as
Autor A conducted a research study on the performance of banks by using financial ratios. He concluded that profitability improved because of improved asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B who highlighted the role played by operational efficiency in improving the bank's returns.

This strategy demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are delayed or rejected due to plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if you reference previous studies, the language should be unique to your project.

Utilize plagiarism checking software if feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou-mcom project, reread your literature review carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, if the flow is rational, and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain why my study is needed. If the answer is yes, your literature review is on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review for an ignou project may initially be challenging particularly for students who are returning to university after a gap. When you understand that it is about analysis and connections rather than recitation, the challenge can be accomplished.

Spend time reading, think and write in your unique voice. That effort reflects clearly in the final work. It often is the difference between an average project and a well-crafted one.