How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature can be the most elusive component of their project. This is particularly true for students working on an ignou-mcom project where academic depth is expected but guidance often appears to be limited. Students typically ask if they are required to summarize books or revise journal articles, or simply gather quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that the difference can impact the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not a report of the amount of material you've read. It is written to show that you are knowledgeable about the existing work related to your area of study and how your research fits into it. IGNOU examiners examine the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link the research directions with your theory.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it important to be aware of the reason this section is part of an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three main purposes.

First, it demonstrates that the subject matter you've chosen has been previously studied and has academic significance. Additionally, it can help you recognize gaps or limitations in earlier studies. Thirdly it helps you establish an understanding of studies' goals and research methodology.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous assignments or web-based sources. This usually leads to small marks or project failure. IGNOU will require original content even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. At the same time extremely basic explanations are being discouraged. For an ignou master's degree project the literature review should reflect postgraduate knowledge.

You are expected to review books, research papers journals, reports as well as government publications that are related to your subject. The main focus should be on those studies that directly connect with your research field.

For example, if your project is on financial performance of banks Then your literature review should focus on earlier studies in relation to financial ratios bank performance, profitability analysis and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One mistake that students often make is combining too many irrelevant sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For a project in ignou anywhere between fifteen and twenty powerful sources are generally enough in the event that they are carefully selected.

Some good sources are academic journals popular books written by well-known authors, RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, as well as university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always go for the most recent research particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. These older studies may be included only if the studies are fundamental in manner.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve reading comprehension and creates a positive impression. Instead of composing random summaries of the work, break down sections of the review in logical sections.

You could organize the chapter depending on the theme, the time period method, variables, or methodologies examined. For instance, one chapter may focus on research studies related to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, and another on operational efficiency.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you're not copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is to be professional but easy. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary terminology. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Every study you review should include the author's name, the year of study, the objective, methodology, and most important results. Be careful not to list them mechanically. Make an effort to link one study with the other.

If you're discussing some research, you might explain how another author's work supported or disputed those findings. This comparative approach adds depth to your ignou MCOM project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review as a textbook chapter. Basic concepts such as definition of accounting or meaning of management doesn't belong in this article unless they are directly linked to prior studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in the style of your personal words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying indicates dependence.

Students often fail to connect publications to their personal research topics. The research you refer to should have a clear link to the research goals.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most significant outcomes of reviewing the literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluations expect you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or where more research is required.

After examining a variety of studies, you may observe that most studies focus on large organisations but small companies were not considered. Some studies have used secondary data, whereas primary data was not enough.

This is a reason for your projects ignou.com. Without it, your project will seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.

Each study mentioned must be listed in the reference list at the end of the project. References that are not included raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes when reviewing literature. In text citations work better and is more professional in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the book review needs to be. There's no standard rule but, for an ignou for an mcom project, the length typically ranges from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length should be determined by your topic's complexity. A bigger topic will require more research. A concentrated topic will require less but more in-depth discussions.

Inadequately long reviews and no the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A researched bank performance and discovered good results

Write in this manner
For example, author A conducted an investigation on bank performance by using financial ratios. The study found that profitability improved thanks to better asset control. The findings were later confirmed by Author B who pointed out the role played by operational efficiency when it comes to improving the bank's returns.

This type of approach shows the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is appreciated in an MCOM IGNOU solved project (please click the up coming article) project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get cancelled or delayed due copies of literature reviews. However, even if you use previously published studies, the style has to be distinctly yours.

Check for plagiarism using tools if possible. Then, rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting an ignou mcom research, read through the literature review attentively. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, if the flow of the study is coherent, and whether it is linked naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the reasons why my study is required. If yes, your review on literature will be in the best path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review as part of an ignou master's thesis may feel challenging at first especially for those who return to academics after a gap. But once you understand that it's more about analysis and connecting that memorization, the work becomes manageable.

It is important to take time to read, think, and write in your own voice. It is reflected clearly on your final product and often marks the difference between the average submission and a impressive one.