How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students enrolled in IGNOU review, reviewing literature is often the most difficult aspect of their project. This is particularly true for those working on IGNOU's mcom projects, where academic depth is expected. However, the direction often isn't clear. Students frequently ask if they must write summaries of books, rewrite journal articles, or simply gather quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not a report of how much material you have read. It's written to demonstrate your understanding of the literature that is relevant to your topic and how your work fits in. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before beginning any writing, it must be understood why the chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three main functions.

First, it demonstrates that the subject matter you've chosen is one that has been studied in the past and is of academic importance. Second, it aids you determine the gaps or shortcomings in earlier studies. In addition, it can provide an overview of your studies' goals and research methodology.

Many students take this chapter as a formality, and take content from other projects or from online sources. This practice usually leads to low marks or project rejection. IGNOU will require original content even when discussing previous studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. While doing so the use of very basic explanations is discouraged. For an ignou master's degree project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

You're expected review books, research papers Journals, reports, and occasionally, government publications that relate to your subject. The emphasis should be placed on studies closely related to your research area.

If, for instance, your task is to study the financial performance of banks the literature review should focus on prior research in relation to financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. Quality is more important than quantity. For an ignou project between 15 and 20 reliable sources will suffice when they're well-chosen.

These are good sources for academic journals highly regarded books by well-known writers, RBI publishing, state reports and even university research papers. Websites with ambiguous authorship should be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent that are from the last ten years. It is possible to include older studies only if they're of a fundamental in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well organized chapter improves perception and readability. Instead of composing short summaries that are not organized, divide sections of the review in sensible sections.

You can structure the chapter based on themes, time period research methodology, or other variables which are being studied. For instance, one chapter might focus on studies that relate to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity and another focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure can help evaluators realize that you're more than just copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be simple and academic. Avoid a lot of language and jargon. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Each study you present should be accompanied by the name of the author, year of study, goals, methodology, as well as major findings. However, do not list them in a logical manner. Try to connect one study to another.

For example, after discussing one study, you could highlight how another author's study supported or refuted these findings. This kind of approach can add depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review in the form of a textbook chapter. Explaining basic concepts such as the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management does not belong in this section unless it is directly connected with previous research.

Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your review of literature should be written by you in one's own terms. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas writing in a copy shows dependency.

Students also forget to link books to their own research field. The research you refer to should be clearly linked to your research objectives.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main results of a review of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU evaluaters want you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or if further research is needed.

After examining a variety of studies, it's possible that studies were focused on large businesses while smaller companies were neglected. And earlier studies used secondary data but primary data were not sufficient.

This void is the reason for your initiative with ignou MCOM. Without it, your project may appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however consistency matters more than perfection.

Each research study should be included in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.

Do not use footnotes for literature reviews. The in-text citation is better and appears cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the reviews of books should last. There isn't a set rule however, for an ignou MCOM project, this chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on how complex the topic is. For a broad topic, you will need greater research, whereas a targeted topic requires fewer, but more in-depth discussions.

Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
The author analyzed bank performance and came across positive results

Write as such
The author A conducted an investigation on the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study found that profitability improved because of improved asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B, who emphasized the importance of operational efficiency in boosting bank profitability.

This strategy demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is a must in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are refused or delayed because of duplicated literature reviews. Even if your reference is to previous studies, the language will have to match your own.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible, and modify content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM project work IGNOU task, revisit your literature review carefully. Check whether each study is relevant, whether the flow of the study is coherent and if your chapter will naturally lead to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason the need for my study. If the answer is yes then your review on literature will be in the best track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou MCOM project can be a challenge at first Particularly for students returning to school after a break. Once you realize that it's focused on connection and analysis rather than memorization, the project becomes manageable.

Take time to read, think and write with your own voice. This effort will be evident in the final draft and often determines the difference between your average work and a impressive one.