How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

In the case of many students at IGNOU The review of books is the most confusing component of their project. This is especially the case for those who are working on an ignou mcom assignment, in which academic depth is expected but guidance often isn't available. Students usually ask if should write down their book chapters, edit journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that differences can affect the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not a report of how much of the literature you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you have grasped the works that are currently being done on the subject you are researching and how your project fits in. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter since it showcases your ability to connect theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is crucial to consider the reasons this section is part of an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three major purposes.

It first shows that the subject matter you've chosen already has been explored and is of academic importance. Second, it helps you discover gaps or issues in earlier studies. Thirdly, it establishes the foundation for your research objectives and methodology.

A lot of students view this chapter as a formality, and duplicate content from previous projects or online sources. This often results in poor marks or even project rejection. IGNOU insists on original writing, even when discussing previous studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. On the other hand it is recommended that students write in a simple way. also not recommended. For an ignou master's degree project the literature review should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

You're expected review research papers, books journals, reports, and sometimes, government publications related to your topic. The primary focus should be on research related to your area of study.

For instance, if your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks Your literature review should focus on earlier studies about financial ratios financial performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. More important is quality than quantity. For a project in ignou between 15 and 20 solid sources are typically enough for a good selection.

Some good sources are academic journals popular books written by well-known the authors RBI publications, government reports, and university level research papers. Websites with ambiguous authorship should be avoided.

Always go for the most recent research which are typically from the last 10 years. The older studies may be included in the event that they are fundamental in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of writing random summaries, you can divide sections of the review in logical sections.

You could organize the chapter by theme, time period research methodology, or other variables the authors have studied. For instance, one section could discuss research related to profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity and another regarding operational efficiency.

This format helps evaluaters understand that you're not copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be simple and academic. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary words. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Each research study you write about should include the author name, the year of study, the objectives, the methodology used, and major findings. But, don't list them chronologically. Try connecting one study with a different one.

For instance, when discussing an article, you can mention how another author supported or refuted the findings. This method of comparison adds an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

An error that is often made is to write the literature review in the form of a textbook chapter. In explaining the basics of concepts like the definition of accounting and the meaning of management isn't appropriate in this section unless it is directly connected to previous research.

Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written by you in Your own voice. Reading from the source shows understanding, and copying demonstrates dependency.

Students are also prone to not linking studies to their own research topics. Any study you discuss must be clearly linked to your objectives for your project.

Establishing a linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key results of the examination of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU examiners expect you explain what the previous researchers missed and where further research is required.

When you look over a range of studies you'll realize that most research focused on large organizations while smaller companies were ignored. In the past, studies utilized secondary data, however primary data were not sufficient.

This is why it's the main reason for your project in the ignou mcom. Without it, your plan could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally follows APA style, but consistent writing is more important than flawlessness.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the list of references at the end of the project. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. A citation in text works better and appears cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of their literature reviews should run. There isn't a set rule but for an mcom project, this chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred between two thousand and a thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on what the topic's difficulty. A more broad subject requires the most research, whereas a focused topic needs fewer but more in-depth discussions.

Writing lengthy reviews that are not needed without the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A studied the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write as such
Write as this: Author A conducted a study about banking performance with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased because of better asset administration. The findings were later confirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the role of operational efficiency in increasing bank returns.

This approach displays an understanding and analysis that is essential to an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are deferred or even rejected due to copy-pasted literature reviews. If you do refer to earlier studies, the language is yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible and rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your IGNOU MCOM project submission guide (simply click the following article) mcom project, reread the review of literature carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, whether you can follow the logic of the review and whether the chapter flows naturally towards your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the need for my study. If yes then it's on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou project can be a challenge at first especially for students returning to school after a long hiatus. If you can realize that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorizing information, the task is manageable.

Spend time reading, think, and write in your unique voice. This dedication is clearly reflected on the final piece and can make the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a solid one.