How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

Many students taking part in IGNOU reviewing literature can be the most confusing component of their project. This is particularly true when working on IGNOU's mcom projects, where academic depth is expected. However, the direction often isn't available. Students are often asked if they require a summation of their books, modify journal articles, or simply gather quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not a document that demonstrates how much material you have read. It is written to show that you are knowledgeable about the previous work that pertains to the subject you are researching and how your project is a part of it. IGNOU examiners examine the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to connect concepts with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it important to be aware of the reason this particular chapter is required in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three main goals.

It first shows that the topic you selected has been previously studied as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Furthermore, it will help you find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. Thirdly it helps you establish an outline for your research goals and the methodology.

Many students take this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or from online sources. This can result in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU expects original writing even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. Additionally explaining in the simplest way is not permitted. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

It is expected that you read research papers, books and reports, as well as journals and occasionally, government publications that relate to your topic. The attention should be focused on studies that directly connect with your research topic.

For instance, if the study is about the financial performance of banks Then your literature review must focus on earlier research related to financial ratios, banking performance, profitability analysis and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. When it comes to an ignou mcom project roughly fifteen to twenty reliable sources will suffice should they be selected carefully.

Academic journals are a good option and reputable books written by well-known creators, RBI publishing, state reports and even university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent that are from the last ten years. The older studies may be included but only if it is foundational in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

An organized chapter improves perception and readability. Instead of writing short summaries that are not organized, divide an overview of literature into sensible sections.

You can arrange the chapter using themes, period methods, or variables that are studied. For instance, one section may focus on research studies related to the profitability of a business, while another section may concentrate on liquidity, and a third one on operational efficiency.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you are not just copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be academic but simple. Avoid a lot of language and use of jargon. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.

Each study you present should include the author's name, the year of study, the objective, methodology, as well as significant findings. However, don't list them in a linear manner. Try to connect one research with the other.

For instance, after discussing one study, it is possible to mention how another author supported or opposed those findings. This kind of approach can add the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review as an academic chapter. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like definition of accounting or the significance of management doesn't belong here unless directly linked to studies that have been done previously.

Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in the style of your personal words. Reading from the source shows understanding, and writing in a copy shows dependency.

Students may also not link the literature to their research field. Any study you discuss must have a clear connection your goals for the project.

Links Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key result of reviewing literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to explain what the previous researchers missed or where further study is required.

In a discussion of multiple studies you'll see that most studies focus on large organisations smaller firms were unaddressed. The earlier studies also used secondary data, while primary data was limited.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your plan could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but consistent writing is more important than flawlessness.

All studies discussed must be included in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. In-text citations are more efficient and appears more professional in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the writing review must be. There's no definitive rule but for an MCOM project, the chapter generally spans from fifteen to and two thousand words.

The length should depend on the complexity of the topic. A larger topic demands more research, while a particular topic will require fewer, but deeper discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analysis does not improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A conducted a study of banking performance and found good results

Write this way
For example, author A carried out a study on the performance of banks using financial ratios, and concluded that profitability increased because of better asset administration. This finding was later supported by Author B who stressed the importance of operational efficiency in enhancing return on investment for banks.

This approach emphasizes an understanding and analysis that is highly valued in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get denied or delayed because of duplicated literature reviews. Although you may refer to previous research, the language needs to reflect your unique style.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible. Then, rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Prior to submitting your ignou MCOM project work IGNOU (click through the up coming website page) project, reread the literature review thoroughly. Verify that each research is relevant, if the flow of the study is coherent and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear the reasons why my study is required. If yes, you're on the correct path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou project may be daunting at first in particular for students who are returning into academics after a time off. But once you recognize that it's about analysis and connections rather than memorization, the task becomes doable.

Take time to read, think and write in your own voice. This effort will be evident on your final product and often makes the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a powerful one.