How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students enrolled in IGNOU and IGNOU, the study of literature becomes the most confusing portion of their work. This is especially true when working on an ignou project for mcom, where academic depth is expected, however guidance often feels a bit limited. Students frequently ask if they require a summation of their books, modify journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not intended to be a record of how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the prior work on your topic and how your project fits within it. IGNOU examiners examine this chapter due to your ability to connect ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it important to be aware of the reason this particular chapter is required in an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three major purposes.

First, it demonstrates it is clear that the topic you've chosen is one that has been studied in the past as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Furthermore, it will help you discern gaps or deficiencies in earlier studies. It also provides the basis for your research goals and the methodology.

Many students see this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous assignments or web-based sources. This typically results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU requires original work even when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. The same time any explanation that is not basic is also not recommended. In an ignou project the literature review should reflect an understanding of postgraduate levels.

It is expected that you read books, research papers report, journals, and even government publications pertaining to your topic. The focus should be on studies that directly connect with your area of study.

In the case of example, if your project focuses on the financial health of banks Then your literature review should focus on prior research about financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake made by students is selecting too many unrelated sources. Quality matters more than quantity. For an ignou mcom project about fifteen to twenty sturdy sources is usually sufficient If they're chosen with care.

Excellent sources include academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous the authors RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, and even university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

It is always best to choose recent studies at least from the last ten years. It is possible to include older studies only if they're foundational in study.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter increases reading comprehension and creates a positive impression. Instead of composing brief summaries on the fly, separate chapters of a literature analysis into clear sections.

The chapter can be organized by theme, time period, methodology, or variables examined. For example, one section could discuss research related to profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity, and a third focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure assists evaluators to understand that you're not taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is to be professional but easy. Avoid a lot of language and vocabulary. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Every study you review should include the name of its author, the year of study, the objective, methodology, and major findings. But, don't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Try connecting one study with another.

For example, after discussing the findings of one study, you could discuss how a different author's findings supported and/or refuted the findings. This kind of approach can add complexity to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review in the form of the kind of chapter in a textbook. Simply explaining concepts such as what accounting is and the meaning of management should not be included here unless directly linked with previous research.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in your own words. This shows your understanding. using copying can show dependency.

They are also often unable to link books to their own research study. Any study you discuss must have a clear connection to your research objectives.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main results of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU reviewers expect you to show what earlier researchers missed or where further study is needed.

In the course of discussing several studies you will notice that the majority of research focused on large organizations as small businesses were absent. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, however primary data was scarce.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your project could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU MCOM project topics [This Internet site] generally follows APA style, however being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Every study discussed must appear in the reference list at the end of the project. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.

Do not use footnotes for literature reviews. In text citation works better as it appears cleaner in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of their literature reviews should last. There isn't a set rule and for an ignou for an mcom project, the length typically runs from fifteen hundred up to two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the subject's complexity. A more broad subject requires more research. A narrowly focused subject requires less but deeper discussions.

Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A studied the bank's performance and got good results

Create this type of writing
An author conducted a research study on banking performance based on financial ratios. She concluded that profitability increased because of better asset administration. This conclusion was later validated by Author B who stressed the role played by operational efficiency in boosting bank profitability.

This approach displays an understanding and analysis that is a must in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to review of literature that has been copied. Even if you reference previously published studies, the style must be your own.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when you can and then rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is much better than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou-mcom task, revisit the entire literature review. You should determine whether the research is relevant, if the flow of information is clear and whether your chapter will naturally lead to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain why my research is necessary. If yes, it's on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou project can be a challenge at first particularly for students who are returning to school after a break. If you can realize that it's more about analysis and connecting than memorization, the project becomes easier to manage.

Be sure to read, consider, and write in your unique voice. That effort reflects clearly in the final draft and often is the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a strong one.