How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students who are enrolled in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature can be the most elusive section of the work. This is especially true when working on the ignou master's degree project in which academic depth is expected. However, instruction often isn't as clear. Students typically ask if they should write down their book chapters, modify journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing how different approaches can impact the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not written to reveal how much literature you've read. It is written to show how well you know the current research related to your field and how your project fits in. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter since it showcases your ability to connect the theory and research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it is crucial to understand why the chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three main functions.

In the first place, it indicates that the topic you chose already has been explored and has relevance to academic research. Second, it helps you find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. Thirdly it helps you establish an understanding of research objectives and methodology.

Students often view this chapter as a formality and duplicate content from previous projects or other sources online. This is a common practice that results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU insists on original writing, even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. While doing so extremely basic explanations are too much to be avoided. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment, the review of literature must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

You'll be expected to read research papers, books or reports, journals and even government publications pertaining to your research area. The attention should be focused on studies which are directly related to your research area.

In this case, for example, if your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks and banks, then your literature search should examine earlier research on financial ratios, financial performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One mistake that students often make is combining too many irrelevant sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. When it comes to an ignou mcom project, around fifteen to twenty strong sources are usually enough in the event that they are carefully selected.

An excellent source of information is academic journals popular books written by well-known authors RBI papers, official reports and even university research papers. Websites that lack clarity on the author should be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent that are from the last 10 years. Older studies can be included only if they're fundamental in study.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

An organized chapter improves reading comprehension and creates a positive impression. Instead of composing unstructured summaries, split all the reviews of books into logical sections.

You can arrange the chapter according to themes, time period, methodology, or variables studied. For instance, one chapter may examine studies that pertain to profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity, and yet another concerning operational efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding that you are not just copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be straightforward but academic. Avoid dense language and excessive jargon. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Each study you discuss should include the author's name, year of study, methodological objective, the main findings. However, do not list them chronologically. Do your best to link one study with another.

For instance, after discussing some study, you can mention how another author supported or challenged those findings. This approach of comparing studies adds the depth of your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review like the kind of chapter in a textbook. Discussing fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting or the meaning of management doesn't belong in this article unless they are directly linked to previous research.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your literature review should be written in you own language. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas writing in a copy shows dependency.

Students are also prone to not linking books to their own research study. Each study you reference should have a clear connection to the objectives of your project.

Links Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most significant results of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluators expect you to expose what researchers of the past missed or indicate where additional research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies you'll find that a lot of studies focused on large corporations as small businesses were unaddressed. The earlier studies also used secondary data, whereas primary data were not sufficient.

This is why it's the main reason for your an ignou project. Without it, your project will appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU Project MCOM (http://arbir.ru/bitrix/rk.php?goto=http://Core.Xii.jp/support/QA/index.cgi?list=thread) generally follows APA style, however being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Each research study should be included in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.

Do not use footnotes for literature reviews. In text citations work better and appears cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the writing review must be. There's no definitive rule to follow, but for an MCOM project, the chapter usually spans from fifteen cents to two thousand words.

The length should depend on the complexity of the topic. A topic that is more extensive requires more studies, while a specific topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analysis is not going to improve your marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A conducted a study of the bank's performance and got good results

Write like this
An author conducted a research study on bank performance with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased due to improved asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B who also emphasized the role played by the efficiency of operations in enhancing returns to banks.

This is an approach that demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is considered important in an ignou mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are cancelled or delayed due copies of literature reviews. Even if you refer to previous studies, the terminology is yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible. Rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM project, make sure you read the literature review attentively. Verify that each research is relevant, if you can follow the logic of the review and whether it is linked naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify what my study needs to be done. If yes then it's on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for a ignou mcom project can be a challenge at first particularly for those returning back to their academics after a period of. But once you know that it is more about connecting and analysis than recitation, the challenge becomes doable.

It is important to take time to read, think, and write with your own voice. It is reflected clearly on your final product and often the difference is between being a weak submission and an average one. outstanding one.