How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU reviews of books is the most confusing aspect of the work. This is especially the case for those working on an ignou mcom assignment, where academic rigor is expected, however guidance often isn't as clear. Students frequently ask if they have to write a summary of books, edit journal articles, or simply collect quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding this distinction can alter the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not intended to demonstrate how much material you have read. It's written to demonstrate your understanding of the literature that is relevant to your topic and how your project is integrated into it. IGNOU assessors scrutinize this chapter because it reflects your ability to connect knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before beginning any writing, it is crucial to consider the reasons the section exists in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three primary functions.

In the first place, it indicates that the topic you chose has been previously studied and has academic relevance. Additionally, it can help you discern gaps or deficiencies in earlier research. The third is that it creates the basis for your research goals and methods.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality and copy content from earlier assignments or online sources. The result is usually lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. The same time any explanation that is not basic is being discouraged. For an ignou mcom project, the review of literature must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

You will be required to read books, research papers report, journals, and sometimes even government publications related to your research area. The emphasis should be placed on studies that directly pertain to the area of your study.

For instance, if the research is focused on the financial performance of banks the literature review should examine earlier research dealing with financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is picking too many unrelated sources. Quality matters more than quantity. For an ignou mcom project roughly fifteen to twenty reliable sources will suffice when they're well-chosen.

Good sources include academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned creators, RBI papers, official reports and university level research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

It is always best to choose recent studies, ideally from the last 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered but only if it is foundational in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve readership and impression. Instead of writing unstructured summaries, split all the reviews of books into logical sections.

The chapter can be organized around themes, a time period as well as the methodology or variables studied. For instance, one chapter might discuss studies on profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity, and yet another focus on efficiency in operations.

This structure aids in understanding that you are not just copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid using a lot of words and use of jargon. IGNOU values clarity over complexity.

Each study you analyze should contain the name of author, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as main findings. But, don't list them chronologically. Try to connect one research with a different one.

For instance, following discussion of some research, you might discuss how a different author's findings supported or refuted these findings. This type of analysis adds an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review as an academic chapter. Basic concepts such as how accounting works or the meaning of management is not appropriate in this article unless they are directly linked with previous research.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your review of literature should be written in the style of your personal words. This shows your understanding. copying shows dependence.

Many students do not connect literature with their own research field. Any study you discuss must be in a direct connection to your objectives for your project.

Connection of Literature Review with Research Gap

One of important outcomes of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU reviewers expect you to be able to demonstrate what prior researchers missed and where further research is required.

When you look over a range of studies you'll notice that the majority of research focuses on large enterprises while smaller companies were not considered. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data but primary information was limited.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your project will appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however the consistency is more important than perfection.

Each research study should be included in the reference list at the end of the study. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. Citations in text work better and is cleaner when used in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long an essay on literature should run. There's no rule of thumb but for an MCOM project, this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents and two thousand words.

The length should depend on topic complexity. A bigger topic will require more research. A concentrated topic will require less but deeper discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A researched the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write as this
Author A performed a study examining bank performance based on financial ratios. She concluded that profitability increased due to improved asset management. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role of operational efficiency in increasing bank earnings.

This method is based on understanding and analysis, which is valued in an IGNOU MCOM project topics mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get cancelled or delayed due copies of literature reviews. However, even if you use prior studies, the language has to be distinctly yours.

Use plagiarism checking tools as possible, and modify content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is superior to copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Prior to submitting your ignou mcom project, make sure you read the review of literature carefully. Make sure that each study is relevant, if your flow follows logically and if the chapter leads naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter explain what my study needs to be done. If yes, then your study's literature reviews are on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature to complete an ignou mcom research project can be a challenge at first particularly for students who are returning to school after a break. But once you recognize that it is focused on connection and analysis rather than memorization, the project is manageable.

Take time to read, think, and write with your own voice. The effort you put into it will show clearly in the final work. It often determines the difference between an average project and a strong one.