How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

There are many students who enroll in IGNOU review, reviewing literature can be the most confusing element of the project. This is particularly true when working on the ignou mcom course, where academic depth is expected but guidance often can be difficult to find. Students are often asked if they must write summaries of books, edit journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and knowing that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not a report of how much literature you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend current research related to your topic and how your research fits into it. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to this chapter since it showcases your ability to link knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is crucial to understand why the chapter exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three principal purposes.

In the first place, it indicates that the area you've selected is one that has been studied in the past and has academic relevance. It also helps you identify gaps or limitations in earlier research. It also provides an understanding of research objectives and methodological.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or from online sources. This can result in the project being rejected or not getting marks. IGNOU expects original writing even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. Additionally the use of very basic explanations is also not recommended. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

You're required to read books, research papers journals, reports, and sometimes, government publications related to your subject. The main focus should be on those studies which directly relate to your area of study.

For example, if your project is on financial performance of banks and banks, then your literature search will focus on prior studies about financial ratios profitability analysis, banking performance and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. Quality is more important than quantity. For an ignou project anywhere between fifteen and twenty good sources can be found If they're chosen with care.

These are good sources for academic journals reliable books from well-known creators, RBI papers, official reports and even university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always look for studies that are more recent most likely from the past ten years. These older studies may be included only if the studies are fundamental in way.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized and organized chapter enhances comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of writing random summaries, break up sections of the review in clear sections.

You could organize the chapter based on themes, time period research methodology, or other variables examined. For instance, one chapter may examine studies that pertain to profit, while another could concentrate on liquidity while the other about operational effectiveness.

This structure assists evaluators to understand that you're not copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing must be formal but not abrasive. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary jargon. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Each study you analyze should include the author's name, the year of study, the objectives, the methodology used, and major findings. Be careful not to list them in a logical manner. Try to connect one study with another.

For instance, when discussing one study, you may be able to mention that another author's findings backed or opposed those findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds greater depth to your project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. It is important to clarify the basic concepts, such as the definition of accounting and the meaning of management is not a good idea here unless directly linked with previous research.

Another error is quoting too much. Your review of literature should be written in one's own terms. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while copying implies dependence.

They are also often unable to link studies to their own research focus. Any study you discuss must be clearly connected to the goals of your project.

Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap

The most important result of the study of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or the areas in which further research is needed.

After looking over several studies, you may observe that most studies focus on large organisations while smaller companies were ignored. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, while primary data was not as extensive.

This gap is the basis for your project in the ignou mcom. Without it, your project may appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however consistency matters more than perfection.

Every study discussed must appear in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. A citation in text works better and is more professional in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the review of literature must last. There's no rule of thumb that can be followed, however for an mcom project, this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents between two thousand and a thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the subject's complexity. For a broad topic, you will need more study, while a narrowly focused subject requires less but deeper discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A researched the bank's performance and got good results

Write like this
This author conducted a study of banking performance using financial ratios. It found that profitability improved due to better asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role of operational efficiency in boosting bank profitability.

This approach is based on an understanding and analysis that is what counts in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get denied or delayed because of review of literature that has been copied. Even if the reference is to previously published studies, the style must be your own.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever you can and then rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is superior to copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou mcom assignment, you should read the literature review attentively. You should determine whether the research is relevant, whether the flow is logical, and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify why my research is necessary. If yes your research paper is right on track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou MCOM IGNOU solved project (peak.mn) project may initially be challenging in particular for students who are returning to academics following a gap. However, once you realize that it's more about analysis and connecting that memorization, the work becomes easy.

Make time to read, consider, and write with your own voice. It is reflected clearly in the final project and often marks the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a powerful one.