How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students enrolled in IGNOU reviewing literature is often the most difficult portion of their work. This is especially true for those working on IGNOU's mcom projects, where academic rigor is expected. However, the direction often can be difficult to find. Students usually ask whether they have to write a summary of books, edit journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding this distinction can alter the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not meant to display how much information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the prior work on your field and how your work fits in. IGNOU MCOM Project Help Online examiners examine this chapter since it showcases your ability to link ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it is crucial to consider the reasons the chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature reviews serve three primary purposes.

It first shows that the subject matter you've chosen has been previously studied and has a scholarly significance. Second, it helps you recognize gaps or limitations in earlier studies. It also provides an overview of your research goals and the methodology.

Many students treat this chapter as a formality and take content from other assignments or other online sources. This typically results in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU demands original writing even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. While doing so extremely basic explanations are too much to be avoided. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment the literature review must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

The expectation is to look over books, research papers and reports, as well as journals and sometimes, government publications related to your area of study. The emphasis should be placed on studies relevant to your area of study.

For example, if your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks Your literature review should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously concerning financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is deciding to use too many disparate sources. Quality matters more than quantity. In the case of an ignou MCOM project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 powerful sources are generally enough as long as they're carefully chosen.

A good source is academic journals reliable books from well-known the authors RBI documents, Government reports as well as university research papers. Websites with unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies especially those from the past 10 years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if they're of a fundamental in study.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve understanding and perception. Instead of composing random summaries and essays, you should divide chapters of a literature analysis into clear sections.

It is possible to organize the chapter using themes, period methods, or variables the authors have studied. For instance, one section could discuss research related to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, while another on operational efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding that you're not simply copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be straightforward but academic. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary vocabulary. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.

Each study that you talk about must contain the name of author, the year of study, the objective, methodology, and significant findings. It is not necessary to list them mechanically. Try to connect one study with another.

If you're discussing one study, you could be able to mention that another author's findings backed or refuted these findings. This approach of comparing studies adds the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to compose the literature review in the form of it is a textbook chapter. In explaining the basics of concepts like the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management is not appropriate in this section unless it is directly connected to earlier studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in yourself. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying implies dependence.

They are also often unable to link the literature to their research subject. Any study you discuss must have a clear connection the goals of your project.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most significant result of reviewing literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU examiners expect you identify what earlier researchers didn't know or the areas in which further research is required.

When you look over a range of studies you may observe that most research focused on large firms as small businesses were disregarded. In the past, studies utilized secondary data but primary data was scarce.

This gap becomes the justification for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your plan could appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however quality is more important than consistency.

Each research study should be included in the reference list at the end of the study. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. A text-based citation is more efficient and appears more professional in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the reviews of books should run. There's no set timeframe, but for an ignou MCOM project, this chapter typically spans from fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length should depend on topic complexity. A more broad subject requires more research while a particular topic will require fewer, but more in-depth discussions.

Inadequately long reviews and no analysis is not going to improve your marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A conducted a study of the performance of banks and came up with positive results

Write like this
An author conducted research on banking performance using financial ratios and found that profitability improved due to improved asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B He emphasized the importance of operational efficiency when it comes to improving bank profits.

This type of approach shows an understanding and analysis that is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get denied or delayed because of published literature reviews that have been copied. Even if the reference is to earlier studies, the language is yours.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. Rewrite content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM research, read through the review carefully. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, whether the flow of the study is coherent, and whether the chapters naturally connect to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes, then this review of literature is definitely on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature to complete an ignou mcom research project might be difficult at first Particularly for students returning back to their academics after a period of. If you can realize that it's more about connecting and analysis than recitation, the challenge is manageable.

Make time to read, think and write in your unique voice. Your effort is evident on the final piece and often marks the difference between the average submission and a well-crafted one.