How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

Many students taking part in IGNOU reviews of literature can be the most complicated aspect of the work. This is especially the case for students working on an ignou mcom assignment, where academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually isn't available. Students usually inquire if they must write summaries of books, write journal articles in a different way, or simply gather quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that the difference can impact the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not a document that demonstrates how much of the literature you've read. It is written to show your understanding of the prior work on your field and how your work fits in. IGNOU MCOM project report (kinoshare.at.ua) assessment experts are attuned to this chapter as it shows your ability to connect ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is vital to understand the reason this particular chapter is required in an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three principal purposes.

First, it shows that the area you've selected has been studied earlier and has academic significance. Second, it aids you discern gaps or deficiencies in prior research. Thirdly, it serves as an understanding of studies' goals and research methodology.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality and copy content from earlier projects or other sources online. This usually leads to lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU is seeking original and unique writing even when discussing previous studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. Additionally any explanation that is not basic is not permitted. For an ignou master's degree project the literature review must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

The expectation is to look over research papers, books or reports, journals and sometimes, government publications related to your subject. The attention should be focused on studies which directly relate to your research field.

In the case of example, if your study is about the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should focus on prior research in relation to financial ratios efficiency of banks, profitability analyses and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One mistake that students often make is choosing too many different sources. Quality matters more than quantity. For an ignou project about fifteen to twenty sturdy sources is usually sufficient provided they are selected with care.

Some good sources are academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous names, RBI publications, federal reports as well as university research papers. Websites that lack clarity on the author should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies at least from the last 10 years. The older studies may be included in the event that they are fundamental in way.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized and organized chapter enhances readership and impression. Instead of writing short summaries that are not organized, divide each literature overview into logical sections.

You can arrange the chapter around themes, a time period, methodology, or variables that are studied. For instance, one section may discuss studies related to profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity and another focus on efficiency in operations.

This structure helps evaluators understand the difference between copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is academic, but simple. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary language. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Each study you discuss should be listed with the author's name, year of study, methodological objective, important findings. Be careful not to list them in a logical manner. Make an effort to link one study with a different one.

If you're discussing some research, you might describe how another researcher supported or opposed those findings. This sort of comparative approach will add depth to your ignou MCOM project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

An error that is often made is to write the literature review in the form of it is a textbook chapter. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like definition of accounting or meaning of management are not needed in this section unless it is directly connected to previous studies.

Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written by you in one's own terms. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying implies dependence.

Students should also make sure to link study findings to their own issue. Each study you reference should have a clear link to your research objectives.

Establishing a linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the major result of the study of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU assessors require you to expose what researchers of the past missed or where more research is required.

After examining a variety of studies, it is possible to observe that the majority studies centered on large organizations however small companies were disregarded. And earlier studies used secondary data but primary information was scarce.

This gap can be the motivation for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your program could appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Each study covered must appear in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. Citation in text is more effective and is cleaner when used in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the length of their review on literature ought to run. There is no set amount but for an MCOM project this chapter generally spans from fifteen to between two thousand and a thousand words.

The length should depend on the level of complexity of the topic. A larger topic demands more research while a narrowly focused subject requires less but more in-depth discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A did a thorough study of banking's performance and obtained good results

Write this way
In the year A, Author B conducted a study about banking performance using financial ratios, and concluded that profitability improved thanks to better asset control. This was later validated by Author B who stressed the importance of operational efficiency in enhancing returns to banks.

This approach displays the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is what counts in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get cancelled or delayed due copies of literature reviews. Even if the reference is to previous studies, the terminology ought to be uniquely yours.

Check for plagiarism using tools if possible. Then, rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou mcom project, go back through the review carefully. Review each article to determine if it is relevant, if your flow follows logically, and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for why my study is needed. If yes that literature study is in the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou-mcom project might be difficult at first particularly for those returning to school after a break. If you can realize that it is an analysis and connection, rather than memorizing information, the task becomes easier to manage.

Do your best to read, think and write in your own voice. The result of your efforts will be apparent into the final version of your work. This can make the difference between an average submission and a well-crafted one.