How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

Many students taking part in IGNOU it is the reviewing of research becomes the most confusing aspect of the work. This is especially the case when working on an ignou MCOM project in which academic depth is expected, yet guidance frequently feels a bit limited. Students usually inquire if they must write summaries of books, modify journal articles, or simply gather quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that the difference can impact the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not a report of the amount of material you've read. It is written to show how well you understand the available research on your field and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link theoretical concepts to research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, however, it must be understood why the section exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three main goals.

First, it demonstrates it is clear that the topic you've chosen already has been explored and has a scholarly significance. Thirdly, it assists you discover gaps or issues in earlier studies. In addition, it can provide the basis for your research goals and the methodology.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous projects or online sources. This usually leads to small marks or project failure. IGNOU demands original writing even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. In the same way any explanation that is not basic is too much to be avoided. For an ignou master's degree project the literature review should reflect an understanding of postgraduate levels.

You're required to read books, research papers or reports, journals or even publications from the government that relate to your topic. The main focus should be on those studies that directly pertain to the research area you are studying.

For example, if your project is focusing on the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously that dealt with financial ratios, efficiency of banks, profitability analyses, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One mistake that students often make is selecting too many non-related sources. More important is quality than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom between 15 and 20 strong sources are usually enough If they're chosen with care.

These are good sources for academic journals highly regarded books by well-known author, RBI publications, government reports, and university level research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies particularly those that have been published in the last ten years. It is possible to include older studies but only if it is foundational in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter enhances perception and readability. Instead of composing random summaries and essays, you should divide all the reviews of books into sensible sections.

The chapter can be organized around themes, a time period techniques, methodologies, or variables studied. For instance, one chapter may examine studies that pertain to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, and yet another is focused on operating efficiency.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you're more than just copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid dense language and excessive jargon. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.

Each research study you write about should contain the name of author, the year of study, the research objectives, methods, and important findings. But, don't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Try to connect one research with another.

In the case of discussing an article, you can write about how a different author's research supported or contradicted those findings. This type of analysis adds the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

An error that is often made is to write the literature review as the kind of chapter in a textbook. Discussing fundamental concepts like understanding of accounting's definition or of management does not belong in this section unless it is directly connected to previous studies.

Another error is overquoting. Your literature review should be written in the style of your personal words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying indicates dependence.

Students may also not link sources to their own research area. Every study you mention should be in a direct connection to your research objectives.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the major results of a review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU assessors require you to show what earlier researchers missed or if further research is needed.

After having discussed a myriad of studies it is possible to observe that the majority research was focused on large companies as small businesses were disregarded. It is also possible that previous studies used secondary data, but the primary data was not as extensive.

This gap serves as the rationale for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, the project might appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but consistent writing is more important than flawlessness.

Each research study should be included in the list of references at the end of the study. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. In text citations work better and is cleaner when used in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the reviews of books should run. There isn't a set rule but, for an ignou MCOM project this chapter generally spans from fifteen to -two thousand words.

The length should be determined by how complex the topic is. A broader topic requires more research. A concentrated topic will require less but more extensive discussions.

Writing lengthy reviews that are not needed without analysis is not going to improve your marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A researched bank performance and discovered good results

Write it like this
This author carried out a study on the performance of banks using financial ratios. It found that profitability improved through better asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role of operational efficiency in enhancing bank profitability.

This is an approach that demonstrates understanding and analysis, which is considered important in an ignou MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are stopped or rejected because of review of literature that has been copied. Although you may refer to previous research, the language you use must reflect the original.

Make use of plagiarism-checking tools if you can and then rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is far better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM project work IGNOU project, read the review of literature carefully. Make sure that each study is relevant, if the flow is logical and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason the need for my study. If yes, this review of literature is definitely on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review for an ignou MCOM project may initially be challenging in particular for students who are returning to academics following a gap. But once you know that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorization of information, the task becomes easy.

Take time to read, think, and write in your unique voice. It is reflected clearly in your final product and often determines the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a high-quality one.