How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

Many students taking part in IGNOU reviewing literature is often the most difficult part of the assignment. This is especially true for those who are working on an ignou-mcom project where academic depth is expected but guidance often feels limited. Students often ask if they must write summaries of books, modify journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that a distinction could alter the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not written to reveal how much literature you've read. It is written to show how much you comprehend literature that is relevant to the subject you are researching and how your project is a part of it. IGNOU examiners examine this chapter because it reflects your ability to link knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it is essential to know why this particular chapter is required in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three primary functions.

First, it demonstrates that the area you've selected has been previously studied and has a scholarly significance. Furthermore, it will help you recognize gaps or limitations in previous studies. In addition, it can provide the basis for your research objectives and methodology.

A lot of students view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous assignments or web-based sources. This usually leads to small marks or project failure. IGNOU requires original work even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. However explaining in the simplest way is too much to be avoided. For an ignou master's degree project the literature review should reflect an understanding of postgraduate levels.

You're expected review research papers, books or reports, journals and occasionally, government publications that relate to your field of study. The emphasis should be placed on studies that directly link to your research area.

In this case, for example, if your research focuses on the financial performance of banks the literature review should examine earlier research about financial ratios performances of banks, profitability studies, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most common mistake students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. Quality is more important than quantity. For a project in ignou roughly fifteen to twenty good sources can be found should they be selected carefully.

Excellent sources include academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned the authors RBI publications, federal reports as well as university research papers. Websites that lack clarity on the author should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies which are typically from the last ten years. Some older studies are acceptable only if they're foundational in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves readership and impression. Instead of composing random summaries and essays, you should divide an overview of literature into logical sections.

You can structure the chapter around themes, a time period method, variables, or methodologies to be studied. For example, one section may cover studies related profit, while another could concentrate on liquidity, and another on operational efficiency.

This structure can help evaluators realize that you're not taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing must be formal but not abrasive. Avoid dense language and excessive jargon. IGNOU values clarity over complexity.

The study you are discussing should include the author's name, year of study, objectives, the methodology used, and the major findings. However, don't list them mechanically. You should try to link one study with another.

For instance, when discussing some research, you might describe how another researcher supported or disputed those findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds depth to your ignou MCOM project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One frequent error is writing the literature review as an academic chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like how accounting works or the meaning of management do not belong here unless directly linked to other studies.

Another error is quoting too much. Your review of literature should be written in one's own terms. Reading from the source shows understanding, and copying shows dependency.

Students should also make sure to link books to their own research area. Every study you write about should be in line with the objectives of your project.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the major results of a review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or where further study is required.

After examining a variety of studies, you'll see that most research focuses on large enterprises, while small firms were left out. In the past, studies utilized secondary data but primary information was scarce.

This gap becomes the justification for your project in the ignou mcom. Without it, your plan could appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but it is more about consistency than perfection.

Each study must be mentioned in the reference list at the end of the study. References that are not included raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. A text-based citation is more efficient and looks cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long their literature reviews should be. There's not a standard for length but for an to do an MCOM project the chapter usually ranges between fifteen hundred or two thousand words.

The length should depend on the complexity of the topic. A more broad subject requires additional research while a specific topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without an analysis won't help marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A researched banking's performance and obtained good results

Write it like this
Autor A conducted research on bank performance using financial ratios. They concluded that profitability increased due to improved asset management. This result was later confirmed by Author B who stressed the role played by operation efficiency in improving returns to banks.

This approach displays an understanding and analysis that is highly valued in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU MCOM Project Help Online takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are cancelled or delayed due copies of literature reviews. Even if you refer to earlier studies, the language ought to be uniquely yours.

Use plagiarism checking tools if possible, and modify content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Prior to submitting your ignou mcom task, revisit the literature review attentively. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, if the flow of information is clear and if the chapter naturally leads to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for why my research is necessary. If yes, then your review on literature will be in the best track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature to be used in an ignou mcom assignment may be daunting at first Particularly for students returning into academics after a time off. If you can realize that it's about connection and analysis, rather than memorization of information, the task is easy to handle.

You should take the time to read, consider, and write in your own voice. It is reflected clearly in the final project and often determines the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. powerful one.