How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students enrolled in IGNOU reviews of literature can be the most confusing component of their project. This is especially true for students working on the ignou mcom course, where academic rigor is expected. However, the direction often isn't as clear. Students frequently ask if they should write down their book chapters, modify journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and understanding that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project.

A literature review is not intended to demonstrate the quantity of information you've read. It is written to show how well you understand the current work in relation to your topic and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter as it shows your ability to link the research directions with your theory.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it is crucial to understand why this chapter is needed in an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three main goals.

First, it shows that the subject you chose already has been explored as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Thirdly, it assists you find gaps or weaknesses in earlier studies. Thirdly, it establishes the basis for your research goals and methods.

Many students take this chapter as a formality, and duplicate content from previous assignments or web-based sources. This is a common practice that results in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU insists on original writing, even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. In the same way extremely basic explanations are also discouraged. When a ignou mcom project is being developed the literature review should reflect postgraduate knowledge.

You're required to read books, research papers report, journals, or even publications from the government that relate with your field. The concentrate should be on studies which directly relate to your research topic.

If, for instance, your project focuses on the financial health of banks Then your literature review should focus on prior research on financial ratios, the performance of banks, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For a project in IGNOU MCOM project topics; http://noktaestates.com/, approximately fifteen to twenty reliable sources will suffice should they be selected carefully.

Some good sources are academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned writer, RBI publishing, state reports and university research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.

Always pick studies from recent years that are from the last 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they're foundational in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized and organized chapter enhances perception and readability. Instead of composing brief summaries on the fly, separate your literature reviews into logical sections.

You can structure the chapter in accordance with themes, time period, methodology, or variables which are being studied. For instance, one chapter could focus on studies related profit, while another could concentrate upon liquidity, while another concerning operational efficiency.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you're more than just copying content but analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is to be professional but easy. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary vocabulary. IGNOU values clarity over complexity.

Every study you review should include the author name, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as most important results. However, don't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. It is best to connect one study with another.

For instance, after discussing some research, you might mention how another author supported or refuted the findings. This method of comparison adds the depth of your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to compose the literature review as a textbook chapter. In explaining the basics of concepts like what accounting is and the meaning of management should not be included in this section unless it is directly connected with previous research.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your review of literature should be written in individual words. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying indicates dependence.

Students are also prone to not linking books to their own research topics. Every study you reference must have a clear connection to your objectives for your project.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of most important result of reviewing literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU evaluaters want you to identify what earlier researchers didn't know or where more research is required.

After having discussed a myriad of studies you'll find that a lot of research focuses on large enterprises as small businesses were overlooked. In the past, studies utilized secondary data while primary data was scarce.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your project could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however quality is more important than consistency.

Every study discussed must appear in the list of references at the end of the project. Any missing references cast doubt on the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. In text citation works better as it appears cleaner in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the literature review should run. There's no set timeframe but for an assignment in mcom, this chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length of the discussion should be based on the subject's complexity. A bigger topic will require more research while a concentrated topic will require less but more extensive discussions.

Reviewing unnecessarily long without analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A looked into bank performance and came across positive results

Write it like this
In the year A, Author B conducted a study of banking performance using financial ratios. They concluded that profitability increased through better asset management. This was later validated by Author B in his study, who focused on the role played by operational efficiency in enhancing bank returns.

This is an approach that demonstrates an understanding and analysis that can be valued in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to plagiarism in literature reviews. Although you may refer to earlier studies, the language needs to reflect your unique style.

Check for plagiarism using tools if feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom project, read the literature review thoroughly. Examine whether every study is relevant, if it flows in a logical manner and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter explain the reason for why I need to study it. If yes, your study's literature reviews are on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou mcom project may be daunting at first Particularly for students returning back to their academics after a period of. When you realize it is all about connection and analysis rather that memorization, the work becomes easier to manage.

Be sure to read, think, and write in your personal voice. This effort will be evident on your final product and can make the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a powerful one.