How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

Many students taking part in IGNOU The review of books is the most confusing section of the work. This is especially the case for those who are working on an ignou MCOM project where academic depth is expected. However, the direction often appears to be limited. Students usually ask if are required to summarize books or revise journal articles, or simply collect quotes. The reality lies somewhere in between, and understanding that different perspectives can impact the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are NOT written to illustrate how much content you've read. It's written to demonstrate how much you comprehend available research on the topic of your choice and how you project is integrated into it. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link concepts with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, it is vital to understand the reason this chapter is essential to an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three principal purposes.

In the first place, it indicates it is clear that the topic you've chosen has been researched before and has academic relevance. In addition, it allows you to identify any gaps or limitations from earlier research. The third is that it creates a base for your research objectives and methodological.

Most students view this section as a formality and take content from other assignments or online sources. This is a common practice that results in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU insists on original writing, even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. At the same time those who write merely to explain their ideas are discouraged. When a ignou mcom project is being developed, the review of literature will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

You're expected review research papers, books, journals, reports, and sometimes government publications related to your field of study. The focus should be on studies which are directly related to your research topic.

As an example, if the project is focusing on the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should be focused on previous studies dealing with financial ratios the performance of banks, profitability analysis and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is picking too many unrelated sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. For an ignou-mcom project, around fifteen to twenty sturdy sources is usually sufficient if they are well chosen.

Some good sources are academic journals well-known books written by renowned authors RBI books, public reports and university level research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.

It is always best to choose recent studies which are typically from the last ten years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if they're fundamental in nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve readership and impression. Instead of composing random summaries of the work, break down this literature summary into clear sections.

You could organize the chapter in accordance with themes, time period methods, or variables which are being studied. For instance, one chapter may focus on research studies related to profits, whereas another may focus upon liquidity, while another on operational efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding that you're more than just copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary use of jargon. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.

Each study you analyze should be listed with the author's name, the year of study, the objective, methodology, and most important results. However, you shouldn't list them in a formal manner. Make sure to connect one study with the other.

For instance, when discussing one study, you could explain how another author's work supported or refuted these findings. This sort of comparative approach will add depth to your ignou MCOM project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review like the textbook chapter. Basic concepts such as the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management is not a good idea in this section unless it is directly connected to other studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in your own words. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while copying implies dependence.

Students should also make sure to link studies to their own research focus. Each study you discuss should be clearly linked to your goals for the project.

Connecting Literature Review with Research Gap

The most important results of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU Project Report for MCOM reviewers expect you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or the areas where more study is required.

In a discussion of multiple studies you'll notice that the majority of research focused on large organizations smaller firms were disregarded. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, while primary data was not as extensive.

This gap is the basis for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your project may appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature The proper citation of the source is essential. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however consistent writing is more important than flawlessness.

Each research study should be included in the list of references at the end of the project. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. Citations in text work better and appears better in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of their literature reviews should be. There is no fixed rule but for an MCOM project, the length of this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents and two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on your topic's complexity. A larger topic demands more studies, while a concentrated topic will require less but more in-depth discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analysis does not improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A did a thorough study of bank performance and came across positive results

Write as this
For example, author A conducted an investigation on the performance of banks using financial ratios and concluded that profitability increased due to improved asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B in his study, who focused on the importance of operational efficiency when it comes to improving bank earnings.

This strategy demonstrates understanding and analysis, which is highly valued in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get blocked or rejected because of plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if your reference is to earlier studies, the language must be your own.

Use plagiarism checking tools as possible and rewrite content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou master of commerce project, go through the literature review attentively. Review each article to determine if it is relevant, whether your flow follows logically, and whether the chapter is logically linked to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear the need for my study. If yes it's on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature to be used in an ignou mcom assignment is not easy at first especially for those who return into academics after a time off. But once you know that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorization, the task becomes easier to manage.

It is important to take time to read, think, and write in your personal voice. This dedication is clearly reflected into the final version of your work. This often is the difference between the average submission and a powerful one.