How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students enrolled in IGNOU reviewing studies can be the most challenging part of the project work. This is particularly true for students working on the ignou mcom course, where academic rigor is expected, but the guidance isn't available. Students are often asked if they require a summation of their books, modify journal articles, or simply collect quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not written to reveal how much of the literature you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the current research related to your area of study and how your project is integrated into it. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to this chapter as it shows your ability to link the research directions with your theory.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, it important to be aware of the reason this chapter is essential to an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three major purposes.

First, it shows it is clear that the topic you've chosen is a subject that has been studied previously and has a scientific significance. Additionally, it can help you discern gaps or deficiencies in earlier research. Thirdly, it serves as an understanding of research goals and the methodology.

Many students treat this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or online sources. This typically results in failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU demands original writing even when discussing the results of existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. But, very basic explanations are being discouraged. For an ignou mcom project, the review of literature should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You are expected to review research papers, books report, journals, and sometimes, government publications related to your research area. The emphasis should be placed on studies related to your area of study.

If, for instance, your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks Then your literature review must focus on earlier research in relation to financial ratios performances of banks, profitability studies, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One of the most common mistakes students make is selecting too many non-related sources. More important is quality than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom approximately fifteen to twenty solid sources are typically enough If they're chosen with care.

Excellent sources include academic journals highly regarded books by well-known names, RBI books, public reports and university level research papers. Websites with unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always go for the most recent research, ideally from the last ten years. Older studies can be included only if they're fundamental in manner.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well organized chapter improves quality of reading and impression. Instead of writing short summaries that are not organized, divide all the reviews of books into clear sections.

You can organize the chapter based on themes, time period method, variables, or methodologies examined. For instance, one section may examine studies that pertain to the profitability of a business, while another section may concentrate on liquidity, and a third focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure helps evaluators understand that you're not simply copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is academic, but simple. Avoid overly complicated language and terminology. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Each study you discuss should include the name of the author, year of study, research objectives, methods, and main findings. However, do not list them in a linear manner. Make an effort to link one study with another.

If you're discussing one study, you may mention how another author supported and/or refuted the findings. This kind of approach can add depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review as an academic chapter. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like what accounting is and the meaning of management is not a good idea in this section unless it is directly connected to previous research.

Another error is quoting too much. Your review of literature should be written in Your own voice. This shows your understanding. copying shows dependence.

Students may also not link studies to their own research topics. Each study you reference should be in line with the objectives of your project.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most important results of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluators expect you to show what earlier researchers missed or where further study is needed.

After examining a variety of studies, it's possible that studies focus on large organisations but small companies were overlooked. In the past, studies utilized secondary data but primary data was scarce.

This gap is the basis for your an ignou project. Without it, your project could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally supports APA style, but it is more about consistency than perfection.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the reference list at the end of the project. References that are not included raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. A text-based citation is more efficient as it appears cleaner in an IGNOU MCOM project synopsis - http://www.signgallery.kr/shop/bannerhit.php?bn_id=12&url=http://www.aykhal.info/go/url=http://N.i.Gh.t.m.a.re.zzro@masuda-khrs.sakura.ne.jp/hsy/yybbs/yybbs.cgi?list=thread - MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the review of literature must last. There is no set amount that can be followed, however for an to do an MCOM project the chapter usually spans from fifteen cents to two thousand words.

The length should depend on the level of complexity of the topic. A topic that is more extensive requires more studies, while a specific topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance and got good results

Write this in the same way as
In the year A, Author B conducted a study on the performance of banks using financial ratios. It concluded that profitability improved due to improved asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role played by operation efficiency in improving returns for banks.

This is an approach that demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is highly valued in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are blocked or rejected because of copies of literature reviews. If you do refer to prior studies, the language must be your own.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible. You can also rewrite your content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou mcom assignment, you should read the literature review carefully. Verify that each research is relevant, whether you can follow the logic of the review and if the chapter flows naturally towards your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason why my research is necessary. If yes then you're on the correct path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for a ignou mcom project can be a challenge at first particularly for students who are returning back to their academics after a period of. But once you understand that it is about analysis and connection rather than memorizing information, the task is manageable.

Do your best to read, think and write with your own voice. This is reflected in your final work and frequently makes the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a outstanding one.