How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students enrolled in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature becomes the most confusing portion of their work. This is especially the case for those working on an ignou mcom project, where academic rigor is expected, yet guidance frequently seems to be a little sluggish. Students typically ask if they need to summarize books, write journal articles in a different way, or simply collect quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding that the difference can impact the overall quality of the project.

A literature review is not a report of how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend current work in relation to your topic and how your project fits within it. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter due to your ability to connect theoretical concepts to research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it is crucial to understand why the section exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three primary purposes.

First, it shows that the subject you picked has been extensively studied and has academic significance. Thirdly, it assists you discover gaps or issues in earlier research. Thirdly, it gives you the foundation for your research objectives and methodological.

Many students take this chapter as a formality, and copy content from earlier projects or even from online sources. The result is usually lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU does not require original writing when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. While doing so simple explanations are being discouraged. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project the literature review should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You're required to read books, research papers and reports, as well as journals and even government publications pertaining to your field of study. The concentrate should be on studies that directly connect with your research field.

In the case of example, if your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks, then your literature review should include earlier studies concerning financial ratios profitability analysis, banking performance, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is selecting too many non-related sources. More important is quality than quantity. For an ignou-mcom project anywhere between fifteen and twenty powerful sources are generally enough If they're chosen with care.

Excellent sources include academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous the authors RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, and even university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies that are from the last ten years. These older studies may be included only if they're foundational in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve perception and readability. Instead of writing random summaries, break up the literature review into sensible sections.

You may organize the chapter according to themes, time period methods, or variables to be studied. For example, one section might discuss studies on the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, and yet another about operational effectiveness.

This format helps evaluaters understand the difference between copying content but analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid dense language and excessive jargon. IGNOU prefers simplicity over clarity.

Each study you analyze should be accompanied by the name of the author, year of study, objectives, the methodology used, and significant findings. Do not, however, list them mechanically. Try connecting one study with another.

In the case of discussing the findings of one study, you could explain how another author's work supported or opposed those findings. This method of comparison adds depth to your ignou MCOM project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review in the form of it is a textbook chapter. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like the definition of accounting or the meaning of management does not belong in this article unless they are directly linked to prior studies.

Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written in individual words. Reading from the source shows understanding, and using copying can show dependency.

Students are also prone to not linking sources to their own research topic. Every research you present should be clearly connected to the goals of your project.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main outcomes of a review of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU assessors require you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or if further research is required.

After discussing multiple studies, you may observe that most research focused on large firms and small businesses were left out. In the past, studies utilized secondary data while primary data were not sufficient.

This gap becomes the justification for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your project may appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature It is vital to have a correct citation. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however quality is more important than consistency.

Every study to be discussed must be included in the list of references at the end of the study. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. Citation in text is more effective and appears better in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the review of literature must run. There's no standard rule but for an MCOM project, the length of this chapter generally spans from fifteen to between two thousand and a thousand words.

The length should depend on what the topic's difficulty. A larger topic demands more study, while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A analyzed the bank's performance and got good results

Write as such
For example, author A carried out a study on bank performance by using financial ratios. The study concluded that profitability improved thanks to better asset control. This finding was later supported by Author B who pointed out the role played by operational efficiency in increasing bank profits.

This method is based on the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is valued in an ignou mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU MCOM project writing services (Recommended Web page) takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are deferred or even rejected due to copy-pasted literature reviews. Although you may refer to earlier studies, the language you use must reflect the original.

Use plagiarism checking tools as feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom project, read the literature review carefully. Make sure that each study is relevant, if the flow is rational and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason the reasons why my study is required. If the answer is yes, then your research paper is right on path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou mcom project may be daunting at first, especially for students returning to school after a break. But once you know that it's about analysis and connection rather than memorization, the project becomes easier to manage.

Spend time reading, think, and write in your own voice. Your effort is evident in the final draft and often can be the difference in being a weak submission and an average one. strong one.