How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

There are many students who enroll in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature can be the most elusive part of the project work. This is especially true for those working on an ignou MCOM project where academic rigor is expected, but the guidance appears to be limited. Students usually ask if should summarize their books, modify journal articles, or simply gather quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that a distinction could alter the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not intended to be a record of the quantity of information you've read. It's written to demonstrate your understanding of the available research on your topic and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter due to your ability to link theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, is crucial to comprehend why the section exists in an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three major purposes.

First, it shows that the subject you have chosen has been researched before in the academic world and is relevant to research. The second is that it assists you to discern gaps or deficiencies in previous studies. Thirdly it helps you establish an outline of your research goals and methods.

Most students view this section as a formality and take content from other projects or from online sources. This approach usually results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU insists on original writing, even when discussing previous studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. But it is recommended that students write in a simple way. prohibited. For a project involving ignou MCOM the literature review will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

You'll be expected to read research papers, books or reports, journals as well as government publications that are related to your subject. The main focus should be on those studies that directly connect with your area of study.

As an example, if the project focuses on the financial health of banks, then your literature review should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously concerning financial ratios financial performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For a project involving IGNOU MCOM project synopsis (a cool way to improve) mcom it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 sturdy sources is usually sufficient if they are well chosen.

Academic journals are a good option that are reputable, well-known books by famous writer, RBI documents, Government reports and university level research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

The best studies are those that are current especially those from the past 10 years. Some older studies are acceptable only if they are fundamental in nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

An organized chapter improves readability and impression. Instead of writing random summaries of the work, break down all the reviews of books into clear sections.

It is possible to organize the chapter by themes, time period as well as the methodology or variables researched. For example, one section could focus on studies related profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity, while another focus on efficiency in operations.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you're more than just copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is to be professional but easy. Avoid overly complicated language and terms. IGNOU places emphasis on clarity over complexity.

Every study you review should contain the name of author, year of study, research objectives, methods, and most important results. Do not, however, list them in a logical manner. Try connecting one study with the other.

For instance, after discussing some research, you might describe how another researcher supported or disputed those findings. This type of analysis adds richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review like a textbook chapter. Simply explaining concepts such as definition of accounting or the significance of management should not be included in this article unless they are directly linked to other studies.

Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written in one's own terms. This shows your understanding. copying demonstrates dependency.

They are also often unable to link the literature to their research area. Every study you write about should have a clear link to your research goals.

Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key results of a review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU reviewers expect you to explain what the previous researchers missed or if further research is required.

After examining a variety of studies, it's possible that studies focused on large corporations however small companies were overlooked. The earlier studies also used secondary data, whereas primary data were not sufficient.

This is a reason for your initiative with ignou MCOM. Without it, the project might seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but coherence is more important than perfection.

Every study discussed must appear in the list of references at the end of the study. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. Citation in text is more effective and looks cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the length of their review on literature ought to be. There is no set amount and for an ignou mcom project, this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on your topic's complexity. A bigger topic will require the most research, whereas a focussed topic requires less but more in-depth discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write like this
This author conducted a study about the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study found that profitability improved because of better asset administration. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B who also emphasized the role of operating efficiency in boosting returns for banks.

This strategy demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is a must in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get stopped or rejected because of the use of copied literature reviews. Even if the reference is to previous studies, the language will have to match your own.

Use plagiarism checking tools as possible. Rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou master of commerce project, make sure you read the literature review carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, if your flow follows logically and if the chapters flow naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this section explain the reasons why my study is required. If the answer is yes, then your research paper is right on path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou mcom project might be difficult at first particularly for students returning to college after a long absence. If you can realize that it is an analysis and connection, rather than memorization, the task becomes doable.

Take time to read, think, and write in your personal voice. That effort reflects clearly on the final piece and often is the difference between an average submission and a outstanding one.