How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For a lot of students studying at IGNOU review, reviewing literature can be the most complicated element of the project. This is especially the case in the case of the ignou mcom course, in which academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually feels a bit limited. Students typically ask if they have to write a summary of books, rewrite journal articles, or simply gather quotes. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not intended to demonstrate the quantity of information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend the existing work related to your field and how your project fits within it. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter because it reflects your ability to connect ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it is crucial to comprehend why this chapter is essential to an ignou MCOM Project Report IGNOU MCOM. Literature reviews serve three major purposes.

First, it demonstrates that the topic you selected has been studied earlier and is of academic importance. It also helps you identify any gaps or limitations from earlier research. It also provides an outline for your studies' goals and research methodology.

Many students treat this chapter as a formality and take content from other projects or sources on the internet. This can result in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU insists on original writing, even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. On the other hand the use of very basic explanations is also not recommended. When a ignou mcom project is being developed the literature review should reflect postgraduate knowledge.

You're required to read research papers, books Journals, reports, and occasionally, government publications that relate to your area of study. The main focus should be on those studies relevant to the area of your study.

For example, if you project focuses on the performance of financials of banks the literature review must focus on earlier research regarding financial ratios financial performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One mistake that students often make is choosing too many different sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. In the case of an ignou MCOM project between 15 and 20 quality sources are usually sufficient as long as they're carefully chosen.

Good sources include academic journals highly regarded books by well-known names, RBI publication, reports from the government, as well as university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies and ideally, from the last 10 years. It is possible to include older studies but only if it is foundational in way.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well organized chapter improves quality of reading and impression. Instead of writing random summaries, break up your literature reviews into sensible sections.

You may organize the chapter depending on the theme, the time period and methodology or even variables researched. For instance, one section may examine studies that pertain to profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity, while another on operational efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding that you are not just copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Beware of a long, rambling style and unnecessary terminology. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.

Every study you review should contain the name of author, year of study, objectives, the methodology used, and the main findings. However, don't list them chronologically. Do your best to link one study to another.

For instance, when discussing an article, you can be able to mention that another author's findings backed or refuted these findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review in the form of the kind of chapter in a textbook. Simply explaining concepts such as the definition of accounting or the meaning of management doesn't belong in this section unless it is directly connected to previous studies.

Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your review of literature should be written in an individual way. Reading from the source shows understanding, and copying shows dependence.

Students are also prone to not linking books to their own research topic. The research you refer to should be clearly connected to your objectives for your project.

Links Literature Review with Research Gap

One of important outcomes of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluators expect you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or where more research is required.

After reviewing a number of studies, you'll notice that the majority of studies focus on large organisations smaller firms were not considered. Or that earlier studies used secondary data, but the primary data was scarce.

This gap is the basis for your project ignou mcom. Without this, your project could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.

Each research study should be included in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.

Don't use footnotes to review literature. A citation in text works better and appears better in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the book review needs to run. There's no definitive rule to follow, but for an MCOM project, the chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred or two thousand words.

The length should depend on topics' complexity. A larger topic demands more study, while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.

Reviewing unnecessarily long without analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A did a thorough study of banking's performance and obtained good results

Write it like this
The author A conducted a research study on banking performance by using financial ratios. The study concluded that profitability improved due to improved asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role played by the efficiency of operations in enhancing the bank's returns.

This type of approach shows understanding and analysis, which is what counts in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are refused or delayed because of copies of literature reviews. Even if you cite previous research, the language will have to match your own.

Utilize plagiarism checking software if possible and rewrite content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou master of commerce project, reread the entire literature review. Make sure that each study is relevant, whether the flow is logical, and whether your chapter will naturally lead to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the reasons for my research. If yes, it's on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou project can be a challenge at first especially for those who return to academics following a gap. But once you know that it is focused on connection and analysis rather than memorization of information, the task is a lot easier.

Do your best to read, think and write in your personal voice. This is reflected on your final product and often is the difference between your average work and a solid one.