How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For many students in IGNOU it is the reviewing of research becomes the most confusing part of the assignment. This is particularly true for students working on an ignou-mcom project where academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually seems to be a little sluggish. Students usually ask if have to write a summary of books, amend journal articles, and simply gather quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.

A literature review is not intended to demonstrate how much information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend previous work that pertains to your field and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU examiners examine this chapter because it reflects your ability to link theoretical concepts to research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it is crucial to understand why the section exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three main goals.

First, it demonstrates it is clear that the topic you've chosen has been previously studied as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Thirdly, it assists you find gaps or weaknesses in previous studies. In addition, it can provide an outline for your research objectives and methodological.

Most students view this section as a formality, and duplicate content from previous projects or even from online sources. This can result in failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU demands original writing even when discussing existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. In the same way the use of very basic explanations is being discouraged. If you are working on an IGNOU MCOM project help (please click the next webpage)-mcom project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.

You're expected review research papers, books journal articles, reports, as well as government publications that are related to the subject you are researching. The attention should be focused on studies relevant to your research area.

As an example, if the research is focused on the financial performance of banks the literature review should be focused on previous studies on financial ratios, profitability analysis, banking performance and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is selecting too many non-related sources. More important is quality than quantity. For an ignou project, around fifteen to twenty sturdy sources is usually sufficient for a good selection.

An excellent source of information is academic journals reliable books from well-known the authors RBI books, public reports and university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies that are from the last 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they're foundational in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well organized chapter improves perception and readability. Instead of writing random summaries and essays, you should divide an overview of literature into sensible sections.

You can organize the chapter based on themes, time period research methodology, or other variables researched. For example, one section may cover studies related the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity and the third focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure can help evaluators realize that you're not copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing must be formal but not abrasive. Avoid dense language and excessive terms. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.

Every study you review should include the name of the author as well as year of study, goal, methodology, and the main findings. However, do not list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. It is best to connect one study to another.

For example, after discussing one study, it is possible to refer to how an author's findings were supported or disputed those findings. The comparative approach adds more the depth of your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to write the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management do not belong here unless directly linked to other studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in you own language. This shows your understanding. copying shows dependency.

Students may also not link study findings to their own area. The research you refer to should have a clear link to your research goals.

Connecting Literature Review with Research Gap

One of important result of the study of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or indicate where additional research is required.

After reviewing a number of studies, you'll notice that the majority of studies were focused on large businesses in contrast to small businesses being neglected. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, but primary data was not enough.

This void is the reason for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your project may seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally follows APA style, but being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Every study discussed must appear in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. References that are not included raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. A text-based citation is more efficient and appears better in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the writing review must be. There's no set timeframe, but for an ignou MCOM project this chapter typically spans from fifteen hundred to two thousand words.

The length should depend on what the topic's difficulty. For a broad topic, you will need additional research while a specific topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analysis does not improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
The author analyzed the performance of the banking industry and came to positive results

Write as this
For example, author A conducted a study on bank performance with financial ratios. He found that profitability improved due to improved asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B who highlighted the importance of operational efficiency in boosting returns to banks.

This approach is based on an understanding and analysis that is highly valued in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are cancelled or delayed due copies of literature reviews. However, even if you use earlier studies, the language will have to match your own.

Use plagiarism checking tools if possible. If you are able, modify your content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Prior to submitting your ignou mcom project, go through your literature review carefully. Verify that each research is relevant, whether the flow is consistent and whether your chapter will naturally lead to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify the reasons for my research. If the answer is yes your research paper is right on path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou project may feel challenging at first in particular for students who are returning to academics after a gap. But once you recognize that it is an analysis and connection, rather than memorization of information, the task becomes doable.

Spend time reading, think, and write in your own voice. This dedication is clearly reflected on the final piece and frequently makes the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a good one.