How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For a lot of students studying at IGNOU The review of studies can be the most challenging section of the work. This is especially the case for those who are working on the ignou master's degree project where academic rigor is expected. However, the direction often appears to be limited. Students typically ask if they have to write a summary of books, edit journal articles, or simply collect quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not a report of how much content you've read. It's written to demonstrate how much you comprehend literature that is relevant to your subject and how your project fits within it. IGNOU MCOM Solved Project reviewers are attentive to this chapter because it reflects your ability to link theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before beginning any writing, it is crucial to comprehend why this particular chapter is required in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three main goals.

It first shows that the subject you chose has been studied earlier as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Thirdly, it assists you discern gaps or deficiencies in prior research. In addition, it can provide an outline for your research objectives and methodological.

Many students see this chapter as a formality, and copy content from their previous projects or sources on the internet. This can result in the project being rejected or not getting marks. IGNOU does not require original writing when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. In the same way those who write merely to explain their ideas are also not recommended. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment, the review of literature should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You'll be expected to read books, research papers and reports, as well as journals as well as government publications that are related to your topic. The study should focus on topics closely related to your research topic.

As an example, if the project is focusing on the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should include earlier studies dealing with financial ratios profitability analysis, banking performance and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. More important is quality than quantity. For an ignou project roughly fifteen to twenty solid sources are typically enough should they be selected carefully.

A good source is academic journals well-known books written by renowned authors RBI publication, reports from the government, and even university research papers. Websites with ambiguous authorship should be avoided.

Always look for studies that are more recent which are typically from the last ten years. It is possible to include older studies but only if it is foundational in study.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized and organized chapter enhances perception and readability. Instead of composing random summaries, divide sections of the review in clear sections.

You can structure the chapter depending on the theme, the time period as well as the methodology or variables the authors have studied. For instance, one chapter may cover studies related profit, while another could concentrate on liquidity, and yet another on operational efficiency.

This structure assists evaluators to understand that you're not simply copying content but analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be simple and academic. Avoid a lot of language and use of jargon. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Each study you discuss should include the name of its author, year of study, objective, methodology, and major findings. Be careful not to list them mechanically. Try to connect one study with the other.

If you're discussing one study, you could be able to mention that another author's findings backed or challenged those findings. This kind of approach can add the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review as the kind of chapter in a textbook. Basic concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management are not needed in this section unless it is directly connected to other studies.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your review of literature should be written in you own language. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while copying shows dependency.

Students should also make sure to link the literature to their research topics. Every study you reference must be in line with the research goals.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main results of the examination of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU assessors require you to identify what earlier researchers didn't know or indicate areas where further research is needed.

After looking over several studies, you'll see that most studies focused on large corporations smaller firms were ignored. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, whereas primary data were not sufficient.

This is why it's the main reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however consistency is more important than perfect.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the list of references at the end of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. Citations in text work better and appears cleaner in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long their literature reviews should be. There's not a standard for length and for an ignou MCOM project, this chapter typically ranges from fifteen hundred -two thousand words.

The length should depend on topics' complexity. A more broad subject requires more research while a concentrated topic will require less but deeper discussions.

A review that is too long and without analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A researched the performance of banks and came up with positive results

Write in this manner
In the year A, Author B conducted an investigation on banking performance with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased through better asset management. This was later validated by Author B who pointed out the importance of operational efficiency in increasing returns to banks.

This approach emphasizes understanding and analysis, which is what counts in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are deferred or even rejected due to the use of copied literature reviews. Even if your reference is to previous studies, the terminology must be your own.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. You can also rewrite your content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou master of commerce assignment, you should read the literature review attentively. Make sure that each study is relevant, whether the flow of information is clear and if the chapters flow naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the reasons for my research. If yes your study's literature reviews are on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature as part of an ignou master's thesis might be difficult at first, especially for students returning into academics after a time off. But once you know that it's focused on connection and analysis rather than memorization, the project becomes manageable.

Make time to read, think and write in your own voice. The result of your efforts will be apparent into the final version of your work. This often determines the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. high-quality one.