How To Write Review Of Literature In IGNOU Project

For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU it is the reviewing of research becomes the most confusing component of their project. This is particularly true for students working on an ignou MCOM project in which academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually isn't as clear. Students typically ask if they need to summarize books, revise journal articles, or simply gather quotes. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that a distinction could alter the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not intended to demonstrate how much information you've read. It is written to show how much you comprehend existing work related to your area of study and how your research fits into it. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to this chapter because it reflects your ability to link theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is crucial to consider the reasons this particular chapter is required in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three primary purposes.

First, it shows that the topic you selected is one that has been studied in the past and has a scholarly significance. In addition, it allows you to discern gaps or deficiencies in earlier studies. Third, it provides a base for your research goals and your methodology.

Students often view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from earlier assignments or web-based sources. This approach usually results in negative marks or project rejection. IGNOU is seeking original and unique writing even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. However it is recommended that students write in a simple way. also not recommended. When a ignou mcom project is being developed the literature review must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

The expectation is to look over research papers, books, journals, reports, and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your field of study. The main focus should be on those studies that directly link to the research area you are studying.

In this case, for example, if your study is about the financial performance of banks Your literature review should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously about financial ratios efficiency of banks, profitability analyses and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One mistake that students often make is selecting too many unrelated sources. It's more about quality than quantity. For a project in ignou roughly fifteen to twenty reliable sources will suffice as long as they're carefully chosen.

These are good sources for academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned authors RBI documents, Government reports and university research papers. Websites with unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always pick studies from recent years particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. It is possible to include older studies only if they're of a fundamental in manner.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves readership and impression. Instead of writing random summaries of the work, break down all the reviews of books into sensible sections.

You could organize the chapter using themes, period methodologies, or the variables which are being studied. For instance, one chapter could focus on studies related profitability, while another could focus on liquidity and another concerning operational efficiency.

This format helps evaluaters understand that you're not simply copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is to be professional but easy. Avoid excessive language and terminology. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

Each study you analyze should include the author name, year of study, objectives, the methodology used, and the major findings. However, do not list them chronologically. Do your best to link one study with a different one.

For example, after discussing one study, it is possible to mention how another author supported or contradicted those findings. This approach of comparing studies adds an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to write the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. Basic concepts such as the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management is not a good idea in this section unless it is directly connected with previous research.

Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your literature review should be written in you own language. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while writing in a copy shows dependency.

Students may also not link study findings to their own field. Any study you discuss must have a clear connection with the objectives of your project.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most important outcomes of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluators expect you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or where further study is required.

In a discussion of multiple studies you may observe that most studies focus on large organisations smaller firms were left out. Some studies have used secondary data, however primary data was not enough.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however consistency is more important than perfect.

Every study to be discussed must be included in the reference list at the end of the study. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.

Don't use footnotes to review literature. In text citation works better and appears more professional in an ignou MCOM IGNOU solved project - https://pacheco.ru/bitrix/redirect.php?goto=http://www.aykhal.info/go/url=http://N.i.Gh.t.m.a.re.zzro@masuda-khrs.sakura.ne.jp/hsy/yybbs/yybbs.cgi?list=thread - project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the book review needs to last. There is no set amount that can be followed, however for an assignment in mcom, this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents to two thousand words.

The length should be determined by what the topic's difficulty. A broad topic will require more studies, while a concentrated topic will require less but deeper discussions.

Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no an analysis won't help marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A studied banking performance and found good results

Write it like this
An author carried out a study on the performance of banks using financial ratios, and concluded that profitability improved thanks to better asset control. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the importance of operational efficiency in increasing the bank's returns.

This approach emphasizes an understanding and analysis that is what counts in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are blocked or rejected because of copy-pasted literature reviews. Although you may refer to prior studies, the language will have to match your own.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible. Then, rewrite the content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou project, read the review carefully. Make sure that each study is relevant, if the flow of information is clear, and whether the chapters naturally connect to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear the reason why my research is important. If yes then your literature review is on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou-mcom project may feel challenging at first especially for those who return into academics after a time off. If you can realize that it is an analysis and connection, rather than memorization, the project is manageable.

Make time to read, think, and write with your own voice. That effort reflects clearly on your final product and can make the difference between the average submission and a solid one.