필요가 있어 찾아 놓은 자료입니다.
니콘: 46.5mm
캐논EOS: 44mm
미놀타AF: 44.5mm
ST10 = 0.66" = 16.8mm
CFW8a = 1.004" = 25.5mm
CFW10 = 0.6" = 15mm
ST10 + cfw8a = 42.3mm
STL (라지포맷, 필터휠내장) = 1.47" = 37.3mm (Sbig 3MM FILTER사용시)
-첨부파일은 STL의 치수가 나와있는 도면입니다.
종류 거리(mm)
Canon FD 42.0
Canon EOS 44.0
Yashica Contax 45.5
Nikon F 46.5
Leica R 47.0
Number of hits on this page:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Camera mounts & registers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAMERA SYSTEM MOUNT TYPE REGISTER
Aaton bayonet(?) 40.00
Alpa bayonet 37.80
Argus bayonet 44.45
Arriflex bayonet 52.00
Bolex breech 23.22
Bolex H8RX 1" x 32tpi thread 15.31
Bronica S2A bayonet & 57x1 thread 101.70
Bronica ETRS
Bronica GS1
Compur 00 rear outer: 25x0.5
front inner: 22.5x0.5
rear inner:
Compur 0 rear outer: 32.5x0.5
front inner: 29.5x0.5
rear inner: 29.5x0.5
Compur 1 rear outer: 39x0.75
front inner: 40x0.75
rear inner: 36x0.75
Compur 3 rear outer: 62x0.75
front inner: 58x0.75
rear inner: 58x0.75
Compur 5 rear outer: 92x0.75
front inner: 86x0.75
rear inner: 86x0.75
C-mount 1" x 32tpi thread 17.526 (0.69")
C-S mount 1" x 32tpi thread 12.50
[also known as "1-32 UN 2A"]
Canon EOS bayonet 44.00
Canon EX1/2 VL bayonet 20.00
Canon R/FL/FD breech or bayonet 42.00
Canon screw M39x1 thread 28.80
Contarex 46.00
Contax RF 34.85
Contax/Yashica bayonet 45.50
Contax G1 bayonet 29.00
D-mount 0.625" x 32tpi 12.29
Eclair bayonet 48.00
Exakta/Topcon bayonet 44.70
Exacta 66 breech lock 74.10
Edixa-Rex bayonet 53.00
Hasselblad/Kiev88 multi start thread 82.10
Hasselblad 500/2000 bayonet 74.90
Icarex breech lock 48.00
(Icarex 35/35S/SL-706 45.50?)
K-mount bayonet 45.46
Kilarflex 92.30
Kilarscope 78.80
Kiev 60/Kiev Six breech lock 74.10
Kiev 88 multi start thread 82.10
Kowa Six/Super 66 breech lock 79.00
Konica AR bayonet 40.70
Konica F bayonet 40.50
Konica RF Hexar screw 27.95
Leica M bayonet 27.95 (27.80?)
Leica R bayonet 47.00
Leica screw M39x26tpi 28.80
Leitz Visoflex I M39x26tpi 62.50 (91.30 total)
(both are sometimes mistaken for M39 x 1mm, a tiny difference, but enough to cause problems with some non-Leica M39 lenses)
Leitz Visoflex II, III Leica M bayonet 40.00 (68.80 total)
M42 screw M42x1 thread 45.46
Mamiya 645 bayonet 63.30
Mamiya RB bayonet 112.00
Mamiya RZ bayonet 105.00
Minolta AF bayonet 44.50
Minolta MD bayonet 43.50
Miranda dual BM/SM bayonet/M42x1 thread 41.50
Miranda Laborec bayonet/M42x1 thread 41.50
Miranda Laborec - M46x1 thread 41.50
dual BM/SM
Narcissus M24x1 thread 28.80
Nikon bayonet 46.50
Novoflex 100.00
Olympus OM bayonet 46.00
Olympus Pen F bayonet 28.95
Olympus E1 bayonet 38.67
(aka 4/3 or four/thirds)
Paxette M39x1 thread 44.00
Pentacon 6 breech lock 74.10
Pentax 6x7 bayonet 84.95 (74.10?)
Pentax 645 bayonet 70.87
Pentax/Practica M42x1 thread 45.46 (add film thickness, and get 45.50mm....;))
Practica bayonet
Practiflex M40x1 thread 45.50(?)
Petriflex breech lock 43.50
Praktina breech lock 50.00
RAS
Rectaflex 43.40
Ricoh breach mount 45.50
RMS 0.800" x 36tpi thread
Rolleiflex SL35 bayonet 44.60
Rolleiflex SL66 bayonet 102.80
Rollei 6008
Rollei 6008 shutter-adapter 31.68
Schneider M26x0.5
T2 mount M42x0.75 55.00
Topcon IC1 bayonet 55.00
Voigtlander Bessamatic 44.70
Wrayflex M41.2 x 26tpi 42.05
Zeiss Ikon Flektoskop/F'meter 84.50 (119.35 total)
Zeiss Ikon Panflex 64.50 (99.35 total)
Zenith 3M M39x1 thread 45.46
Zenit 80 multi start thread 74.10
Microscopic lenses W 0.8" x 1/36" [36tpi]
(RMS)
Tripod mount 1/4" x 20tpi [aka UNC 1/4"]
3/8" x 16tpi [aka UNC 3/8"]
Please note that there are almost a dozen different 1/4" & 3/8" types on the market;
below the descriptions used for hand/machine taps (to cut thread into a hole):
UNC 1/4" (20tpi) [UNified Coarse, thread angle 60 degree, DIN 371]
UNC 3/8" (16tpi) [UNified Coarse, thread angle 60 degree, DIN 376]
UNF 1/4" (28tpi) [UNified Fine, thread angle 60 degree, DIN 371]
UNF 3/8" (24tpi) [UNified Fine, thread angle 60 degree, DIN 376]
UNEF 1/4" (32tpi) [UNified Extra Fine, thread angle 60 degree, DIN 371]
UNEF 3/8" (32tpi) [UNified Extra Fine, thread angle 60 degree, DIN 374]
BSP 1/4" (19tpi) [British Standard Pipe, thread angle 55 degree, ISO (straight cut) or DIN 5156 (spiral cut)]
BSP 3/8" (19tpi) [British Standard Pipe, thread angle 55 degree, ISO (straight cut) or DIN 5156 (spiral cut)]
BSPT 1/4" (19tpi) [British Standard Pipe Tapered, "Rc", thread angle 55 degree, DIN 5156]
BSPT 3/8" (19tpi) [British Standard Pipe Tapered, "Rc", thread angle 55 degree, DIN 5156]
BSPP 1/4" (19tpi) [British Standard Pipe Parallel, "Rp", thread angle 55 degree, DIN 5156]
BSPP 3/8" (19tpi) [British Standard Pipe Parallel, "Rp", thread angle 55 degree, DIN 5156]
BSW 1/4" (20tpi) [British Standard Whitworth, thread angle 55 degree, ISO or DIN 371]
BSW 3/8" (16tpi) [British Standard Whitworth, thread angle 55 degree, ISO or DIN 376]
BSF 1/4" (26tpi) [British Standard Fine, thread angle 55 degree, DIN 371]
BSF 3/8" (20tpi) [British Standard Fine, thread angle 55 degree, DIN 376]
FG/BSC 1/4" (26tpi) [??/???, (bicycle applications), thread angle 60 degrees, DIN 79012]
FG/BSC 3/8" (26tpi) [??/???, (bicycle applications), thread angle 60 degrees, DIN 79012]
NPT 3/8" (18tpi) [National Pipe Thread [USA], to create conical holes (1:16), thread angle 60 degrees, DIN 5156]
NPT 3/8" (18tpi) [National Pipe Thread [USA], to create conical holes (1:16), thread angle 60 degrees, DIN 5156]
Further note that there used to be cheap hand-taps available
(for low speed & low frequency use, about US$10), while it seems
that currently only the harder & more expensive machine-taps are
available (US$20-25).
Other options/differences are in the shape of the 'drain-channels'
of the tap, for normal holes straight channels are fine, for blind
holes you need spiral channels, to get the metal shavings out.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abbreviations used here and in other literature
tpi = threads per inch
M = metric thread
Register = distance flange to film plane
BM = Bayonet Mount
TM = Thread Mount
RMS = Royal Microscopic Screw
When is an adaptor between two systems possible?
An adaptor is always possible; some are widely available, like M42-lens->brandX-camera or T2-lens->brandX-camera.
However, even custom order adaptors have to obey an optical law: the register of the lens system should be LARGER than the camera system. If the register of the lens system is SMALLER, or EQUAL (less than 1mm difference) than the camera system, the adaptor requires an optical element to make infinity focussing possible. Otherwise such an adaptor would act as a macro tube, putting the lens further away from the body than designed!
Also, the above non-optics formula only works if the lensmount is a bit smaller than the camera mount.
The extra optical elements are essentially acting as a mild teleconverter; needless to say that this won't improve image quality, nor do you want a teleconverter at all when using wide angle lenses....
The above is also the reason why there are NO non-optics M42 adaptors for Nikon and Leica (at least none that allows infinity focussing).
EOS adapting specialties
Since the EOS system has a rather small register, some very cute non-optics adaptations are possible: one can mount Leica and Nikon lenses on an EOS body! The adaptors are quite thin, so the lens release mechanism requires major engineering, hence they are very expensive ($200). If one can live with a screw instead of a fast release mechanism, cheaper solutions are possible.
(email me if you want more info about these adaptors).
For detailed instructions how to use these all-manual lenses on EOS cameras, see Neil K.'s site: EOS & Manual lenses
FD->EOS compromises
Many people ask about the possibility of mounting FD lenses on EOS cameras....you can, but not without a large compromise. The following solutions exist:
- Canon high end FD->EOS adaptor: as expensive as the EOS 1.4x, and also contains image degrading optical elements, thereby also acting as a slight (1.26x) teleconverter. Useless with wide angles, and only a real alternative if you already have expensive FD tele's, or can buy one cheap.
- Canon macro FD->EOS adaptor: no lens elements, but you loose infinity focus. Only practical for macro purposes, where infinity focus is not required.
- Aftermarket FD->EOS adaptors: cheap, but contain lens elements, just like the one sold by Canon, and are even worse in optical quality....there are more of these on the market, available for various lens/camera combinations, but all contain these image degrading lens elements. If you want to spoil the good quality of your FD optics, go ahead....;-((
EOS->Nikon incompatibility
Several other people ask whether it is possible to mount EOS lenses on Nikon (or Canon FD) bodies....sadly this is near-impossible, for several reasons:
1) Just like the Nikon->EOS (and Leica->EOS) adaption is so easy, because of very different registers, the same difference makes the reverse situation impossible, mounting an EOS lens on a Nikon body, without additional (teleconverter) optics.
2) aperture on EOS lenses is controlled electronically....therefore you can't control aperture when mounted on any non-EOS body....
3) the first generation of high end EOS optics (including 28-80/2.8-4, 200/1.8, 300/2.8, 400/2.8(mark I & II) 600/4.0 and 1200/5.6) can only focus through their E-M/USM motor (Electronical Manual), not just AF, but also MF. This means *no* focus possible on non-EOS bodies....
And even if one could live with all these problems, an adapter for this purpose has never been made to the best of my knowledge, definately not in commercial quantities....
T2-reverse adaptors
For some applications, a T2-reverse adaptor would be very useful. Examples are mounting OEM lenses on T2 tilt/shift bellows, or even on cheap M42 bellows (by using a second T2->M42 adaptor behind the brandX-lens->T2-camera adaptor).
Another application is using OEM still lenses on C-mount moving picture cameras, by means of a second T2-lens->C-mount-camera adaptor. This also works with Canon LC-1 & LC-2 video cameras.
(email me if you want more info about these T2-reverse adaptors)
Adaptal->EOS adaptors
From: "Mark Fischer"
To:
Subject: EOS Adaptall
Date sent: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 03:33:35 -0600
Is there an Adaptall adapter to allow a Tamaron Adaptall lens to be placed
on a Cannon Eos body? I would be willing to live with manual focus and stop
down metering. Hopefully someone makes something that will work. Thanks for
any help, Mark Fischer.
_________________________________________ Mark Fischer ICQ#:3664138 SMS:
(Send an SMS message to my ICQ): +27831423664138 More ways to contact me:
http://wwp.icq.com/3664138 _________________________________________
From: Self
To: "Mark Fischer"
Subject: Re: EOS Adaptall
Send reply to: w.j.markerink@a1.nl
Date sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 04:01:21 +0100
On 16 Feb 02 at 3:33, Mark Fischer wrote:
> Is there an Adaptall adapter to allow a Tamaron Adaptall lens to be placed on
> a Cannon Eos body? I would be willing to live with manual focus and stop down
> metering. Hopefully someone makes something that will work. Thanks for any
> help, Mark Fischer.
Adaptal->EOS does exist, but it is no longer made, and rather hard to
find.
But a perfect alternative exists, much cheaper too:
Adaptal->M42 plus M42->EOS....the first can often be found on photo
fairs, the second is an adapter you might want to have anyway (as
well as a T2->EOS adapter, not the same thing btw!).
A typical adapting question:
From: Self
To: "Ginny Doehler"
Subject: Re: Nikon/Contax
Send reply to: w.j.markerink@a1.nl
Date sent: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 21:13:55
On 29 Apr 99 at 22:32, Ginny Doehler wrote:
> Just wonder if you are aware of any good company that makes adapters so one
> can use a Nikon lens on a Contax SLR or one that will adapt the lens
> individually? Any ideas would be appreciated.
>
> Ginny Doehler
For what application: macro or normal use?
Normal use requires infinity focus, and since Nikon and Contax are
too close together in register and mount-diameter, only additional
optics will cure infinity, with inherent image quality-loss & a slight
teleconverter effect.
For macro applications you can simply use an intermediate mount like
M39/Leica-thread....these adapters exist in both directions, for
nearly every possible system, made by Novoflex (distributed by
Calumet in the USA).
Converting a lens permanently is quite expensive....not really
recommended, unless you have very exotic optics....and even if, a
second-hand body of either system might still be cheaper....
From: "Willem-Jan Markerink"
To: eos@avocado.pc.Helsinki.fi
Date sent: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:20:26 +0100
Subject: Re: EOS: Re: manual focus lense in eos
Priority: normal
Send reply to: eos@avocado.pc.Helsinki.FI
On 10 Apr 00 at 13:00, Olle Bjernulf wrote:
> In the Canon line, the TS-E lenses (24, 45, 90) and
> the MP-E macro 1-5x'are manual focus.
> With a M42 adaptor you can use any screw mount lens.
> With expensive adapters you can use Nikon and Leica
> lenses. With a discontinued Tamron adapter you can use
> any Tamron adaptall lens.
Note that an Adaptal->M42 plus M42->EOS adapter is a perfect
alternative for the (rather) rare Adaptall->EOS adapter, often at a
fraction of the price (assuming one already has the M42->EOS
adapter).
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
FROM: Sven Hegewisch
SUBJECT: Re: C-Mount (diameter, ...)
DATE: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 08:51:12 +0100
ORGANIZATION: [posted via] Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany)
NEWSGROUPS: sci.engr.mech,sci.engr,sci.optics
Thomas Blotevogel schrieb:
> Hi!
>
> Due to the fact that I have to design an adapter for incorporating a
> filter and an iris diaphragm I need the exact size of a C-Mount
> (diameter, ...), if possible in the metric system. And if there is
> something like an ISo paper about C-Mount please let me also know.
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Kind regards,
> Thomas Blotevogel
C-mount. Cine mount. The first standard for CCTV lens screw mounting.
It is defined with the thread of 1'' (25.4 mm) in diameter and 32
threads/inch, and the back flange-to-CCD distance of 17.526 mm (0.69'').
The C-mount description applies to both lenses and cameras.
C-mount lenses can be put on both, C-mount and CS-mount cameras, but
must use a C-mount adaptor when used on a CS-mount camera. If a C
adaptor is used on a C-mount camera the image will only focus at very
short range, it can then be considered as an economy macro adaptor.
C-mount adaptor. An adaptor used to convert a CS-mount camera to
C-mount to accommodate a C-mount lens. It is simply a ring 5 mm thick,
with a male thread on one side and a female on the other side. It has
a 1'' diameter and 32 threads/inch, as the cameras and lenses. It
often comes packaged with the newer type (CS-mount) of cameras.
Gefunden mit GOOGLE : " C-mount thread "
Gruesse
Sven Hegewisch
FROM: Martin Jangowski
SUBJECT: Re: Was ist das =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= ein Gewinde?
(Vergroesserungsobjektiv)
DATE: 9 Feb 2001 15:45:48 +0100
ORGANIZATION: Phoenix Pharmahandel Aktiengesellschaft und Co
NEWSGROUPS: de.rec.fotografie
Christian Romberg wrote:
> Wei?einer von Euch, was das f? Gewinde sind (sind n?lich auch bei beiden
> noch verschiedene):
> Schneider-Kreuznach Componon 5,6/105; #9856928
> Au?ndurchmesser des Gewindes ca. 32,3 mm
Koennte ein Gewinde 32.5x0.5 sein, das ist das gleiche wie ein Verschluss #0.
Das Componon gabs IMHO mit M39 oder eben #0-Gewinde.
> Boyer Paris 3,5/75; #780188
> Au?ndurchmesser des Gewindes ca. 29,8 mm
Da hab ich bei Steve Grimes nur "Alpax #0" bzw. "Rapax #1" gefunden, haben
beide ca. 1.18" (ca. 29.98mm)
Martin
From: Self
To: "Daniel Derwin"
Subject: Re: Mamiya 645
Send reply to: w.j.markerink@a1.nl
Date sent: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:40:52 +0100
On 15 Apr 01 at 23:03, Daniel Derwin wrote:
> Are there any 35mm type camera lens that can be used on a Mamiya 645 =
> with one of your mounts? I would be particularly interested in a zoom =
> lens if possible.
> Dan Derwin
No sorry, that's impossible for 2 reasons: a 35mm type lens on a
Mamiya 645 would be too far from the film plane (=no more infinity
focus, same as with a macro extension), and such a lens would
not have enough coverage for a 6x4.5cm image....you would get only a
circle with 43.26mm diameter (the diagonal of 24x36mm).
And the latter only increases when you use the lens for strong macro
magnifications (twice the extention is twice the diameter)....so for
both arguments that's the only application available....
Date sent: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 09:24:23 +0200
From: hobbacher@t-online.de (A.F. Hobbacher)
To: w.j.markerink@a1.nl
Subject: Mounts and threads
Congratulations for the compilation of threads. Just one remark: Pipe
treads are an entire different issue than the bolt threads. Example:
1/2"-20 UNF is a bolt with an outer diameter of 1/2" = 12.7 mm. A pipe
thread 1/2" is the thread which fits on a pipe with a nominal diameter
of 1/2". A pipe of ND 1/2" has an outer diameter of about 21 mm which is
also the about the OD of the pipe thread. Please do never confuse these
two ways of designation of threads.
Kind regards
AFH
FROM: Tom Burgess
SUBJECT: Re: c-mount thread
DATE: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 08:30:30 GMT
ORGANIZATION: Shaw Residential Internet
NEWSGROUPS: sci.optics
"Stephen H. Westin" wrote:
>
> Daniel Hembd writes:
>
> > Can somebody give me the dimensions of a C-Mount thread?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Daniel
> >
>
> From the indispensible ,
>
> Mount Register (flange distance)
> C-mount 1" x 32tpi thread 17.526mm (0.69")
>
> --
> -Stephen H. Westin
> Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not
> represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.
Here's another fine reference with practical tapping advice:
http://www.atmpage.com/thread.html
regards, tom
FROM: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Winfried_B=FCchsensch=FCtz?=
SUBJECT: Re: Novoflexar M42
DATE: 20 Jan 2002 10:58:12 +0100
ORGANIZATION: WEB.DE
NEWSGROUPS: de.rec.fotografie
"Olaf Ulrich" <1461-465@onlinehome.de> wrote:
>Helmut F. schrieb:
(Streit ?er M42-Erfindung)
>> Wer hat's erfunden?
>
>훖 ... die Schweiz'r? Nein, ? ... die Sachsen? Keine Ahnung, aber
>M42 als Objektivanschlu?gab es doch schon, als die Japaner
>noch gar nicht wu?en, wie man Spiegelreflexkamera schreibt ...?
Es waren tats?hlich die Sachsen. Lt. Hummel 'Spiegelreflexkameras aus Dresden'
wollten die Russen die alte Praktiflex (mit M40-Anschluss, M39 war schon von
Leitz belegt) auf ein gr秤eres Bajonett umkonstruiert haben und wollten den
Konstrukteur so lange festhalten, bis er es fertig hatte. Er konnte sie dann aber
?erzeugen, da?das kurzfristig nicht machbar sei und schlug daher eine
Vergr秤erung auf M42 vor. Daher ist der zutreffendste Name wohl 'Praktica-
Gewinde'. Es wurde allerdings recht bald von den Japanern ?ernommen (die
?rigens schon in den fr?en 50ern Spiegelreflexkameras bauten, als man in der
Bundesrepublik kaum wu?e, wie man das schreibt) und wird in den USA meist als
Pentax-Gewinde bezeichnet. Die (AFAIK) ersten gescheiten SLRs aus der BRD, die
Edixas, hatten bis in die 60er Jahre hinein das M42er-Gewinde ?ernommen, auch
die Contaflex hatte AFAIK dieses Gewinde.
Winfried B?hsensch?z
FROM: Thomas Kaltschmidt
SUBJECT: Re: Novoflexar M42
DATE: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 09:56:33 +0100
ORGANIZATION: TU Freiberg
NEWSGROUPS: de.rec.fotografie
>>(Streit ?er M42-Erfindung)
>>>> Wer hat's erfunden?
>>>
>>>훖 ... die Schweiz'r? Nein, ? ... die Sachsen? Keine Ahnung, aber
>>>M42 als Objektivanschlu?gab es doch schon, als die Japaner
>>>noch gar nicht wu?en, wie man Spiegelreflexkamera schreibt ...?
>>
>>
>>Es waren tats?hlich die Sachsen. Lt. Hummel 'Spiegelreflexkameras aus
>>Dresden'
>>wollten die Russen die alte Praktiflex (mit M40-Anschluss, M39 war schon
>von
>>Leitz belegt)
>
>Hmm....M40 fehlt noch in meine Liste....
>
>http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mounts.htm
>
>...welches 'Register' hatte dieser Anschluss?
>Und M40x1?
IHMO ja. Wird jedenfalls mit M 40 x 1 angegeben. Das Auflagenma?d?fte
eigentlich das selbe wie bei M42 x 1sein.
Thomas
FROM: Helmut Faugel
SUBJECT: Re: [F] T2 Adapter =?iso-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= Mittelformat
DATE: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:20:31 +0100
NEWSGROUPS: de.rec.fotografie
Oliver Corff wrote:
> Dieter Lefeling wrote:
> :> Stativgewinde Leica
>
> : ?!? Ein M39-Stativgewinde ?-)
>
> Ich meine doch das 3/8"-Gewinde...
Das 3/8" heisst deutsches Stativgewinde, das 1/4" heisst englisches
Stativgewinde. Hab ich zumindest in meiner gestrigen Nachtlektuere
erfahren.
--
Helmut Faugel
Date sent: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 10:40:11 -0500
From: Bernard Cousineau
To: w.j.markerink@a1.nl
Subject: mounts.htm
Hello,
I have noticed that you don't have the Aaton value in your "Camera mounts &
registers" page.
The correct flange focal distance is 40 mm (+- 5 microns). My source for this
number is:
http://www.aaton.com/files/ltr_usermanual.pdf (page 2 of the document).
Many thanks for providing such a useful resource on the internet,
Bernard Cousineau
From: "Miranda Camera.ch"
To:
Subject: Miranda mounts
Date sent: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 12:41:23 +0200
Hi
I found your homepage with the Miranda mounts:
You wrote:
Miranda dual BM/SM bayonet/M42x1 thread 41.50
Miranda Laborec bayonet/M42x1 thread 41.50
Miranda Laborec - M46x1 thread 41.50
Your information's are NOT correct!
M42x1 for Miranda is not correct!
All Miranda cameras (including MIRANDA LABOREC)
without the MIRANDA TM have M44x1 TM!
MIRANDA TM only SM M42x1 thread
MIRAX LABOREC BM/SM LABOREC bayonet/M46x1 thread
LABOREC bayonet is bigger than Miranda
bayonet!
The REGISTER measure 41.50 is not correct!
I have some Miranda service manuals. There is the measure process illustrated
and the depth of the gauge still is 41.65mm. The register must be in +/- 0.02mm
I propose you place that on your web site:
Miranda dual BM/SM bayonet/M44x1 thread 41.65
MIRANDA TM only SM M42x1 thread 41.65
MIRANDA LABOREC dual BM/SM bayonet/M44x1 thread 41.65
MIRAX LABOREC BM/SM LABOREC bayonet/M46x1 thread 41.65
The MIRAX LABOREC bayonet is bigger than the Miranda standard bayonet!
SOLIGOR TM only SM M42x1 thread 41.65
PALLAS TM only SM M42x1 thread 41.65
If you have any question please do not hesitate to ask me.
Regards
Rudolf
SWISS MIRANDA CAMERA COLLECTOR
Member of MHS Miranda Historical Society
MHS Homepage: www.mirandacamera.com
Mailto: mirandacamera@gmx.ch
From: Self
To: "Miranda Camera.ch"
Subject: Re: Miranda mounts
Send reply to: w.j.markerink@a1.nl
Date sent: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 05:59:05 +0100
On 8 Sep 02 at 12:41, Miranda Camera.ch wrote:
> Hi
>
> I found your homepage with the Miranda mounts:
>
> You wrote:
> Miranda dual BM/SM bayonet/M42x1 thread 41.50
> Miranda Laborec bayonet/M42x1 thread 41.50
> Miranda Laborec - M46x1 thread 41.50
>
> Your information's are NOT correct!
>
> M42x1 for Miranda is not correct!=20
> All Miranda cameras (including MIRANDA LABOREC)=20
> without the MIRANDA TM have M44x1 TM!
>
> MIRANDA TM only SM M42x1 thread
>
> MIRAX LABOREC BM/SM LABOREC bayonet/M46x1 thread
>
> LABOREC bayonet is bigger than Miranda
>
> bayonet!
>
> The REGISTER measure 41.50 is not correct!
>
> I have some Miranda service manuals. There is the measure process illustrated
> and the depth of the gauge still is 41.65mm. The register must be in +/- 0.02mm
That 0.15mm difference is caused by measuring at the front vs back of
the film....;))
(this confusion happens with more camera systems, not just Miranda)
But I included your message for the rest of the info, and will add
this note to it....;))
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
From: "Lars Petersen"
To:
Subject: About page with "Camera mounts & registers"
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:42:56 +0100
Hello
Do you have any information about the register of the Olympus E-System
(Four Thirds) mount ?
Best regards, Lars
From: Willem-Jan Markerink
To: "Lars Petersen"
Subject: Re: About page with "Camera mounts & registers"
Cc: "Schuengel, Paul Joachim (Unaxis CS)"
Reply-to: w.j.markerink@a1.nl
On 26 Feb 2005 at 14:42, Lars Petersen wrote:
> Hello
>
> Do you have any information about the register of the Olympus E-System
> (Four Thirds) mount ?
>
> Best regards, Lars
Sorry, no....but it should be relatively good for lens-adaptations,
since smaller format normally means smaller mirror, which allows the
lens to sit closer to the 'film' plane (which is almost necessary,
since smaller format also requires smaller focal lengths, and their
design is optically better if it can be put closer to the film
plane).
(the best design being a symmetrical lens, like the famous Zeiss
Biogon's)
Here some more reading though, including commercial adapters, which I
assume you are looking for:
(ah, finally including the actual spec, 38.67mm, never seen it
before, date-stamp at the bottom suggests it might be only 1 month
old....thanks for the inspiration to dig for this info....:))
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/oly-e/any-lens.html
CC to Paul Joachim, who also asked for this spec recently, in
vain back then....:))
From: "Willem-Jan Markerink"
To: eos@a1.nl
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:05:35 +0100
Subject: Contax->EOS adapter
Cc: infrared@a1.nl
Reply-To: eos@a1.nl
Not 100% sure there never was such an adapter before (without image-
degrading (slight-teleconverting) optics, of course), since I also
recall that some US-manufacturer made an Olympus->EOS adapter....but
today I received a mailing from Germany's largest Contax shop,
announcing a Contax->EOS adapter, to mount Contax-AE and -MM
lenses....169 euro (about US$200).
Not cheap, but neither are the long-existing Nikon->EOS and
Leica->EOS adapters from Novoflex & Z=F6rkend=F6rfer.
(might just as well be that one of those actually manufacturers this
Contax adapter, who knows)
http://www.foto-huppert.de
Willem (now also wondering whether any Zeiss/Hasselblad -> Contax
adapter existed already?....or perhaps even
Contax645 -> Contax-35mm?....always liked that 350/5.6 super-
apochromat, corrected for both IR and UV....;)) Jan
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
From: Cotty
To: "EOS list"
Subject: Re: Contax->EOS adapter
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:23:43 +0000
Reply-To: eos@a1.nl
On 25/3/05, Willem-Jan Markerink, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Not 100% sure there never was such an adapter before (without image-
>degrading (slight-teleconverting) optics, of course), since I also
>recall that some US-manufacturer made an Olympus->EOS adapter....but
>today I received a mailing from Germany's largest Contax shop,
>announcing a Contax->EOS adapter, to mount Contax-AE and -MM
>lenses....169 euro (about US$200).
>
>Not cheap, but neither are the long-existing Nikon->EOS and
>Leica->EOS adapters from Novoflex & Z=F6rkend=F6rfer.
>
>(might just as well be that one of those actually manufacturers this
>Contax adapter, who knows)
>
>http://www.foto-huppert.de
Hi Willem,
You may find this page interesting:
best,
Cheers,
Cotty
___/__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.crypticide.org/users/alecm/astronomy/lens-mountings.txt
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.mapug.com/ragreiner/adapters.html#Flanges
xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/oly-e/any-lens.html
xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.outbackphoto.com/the=5Fbag/paul=5Flens=5Fadapters/essay.html
xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.bobshell.com/adapter.html
xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.cameraquest.com/adaptnew.htm
xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dslrexchange.com/
xxxxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have any question, remark, comment, want to share some philosophy or just want to express your opinion about these pages, feel free to send email to: w.j.markerink @ a1.nl
Back to main page & table of contents: Main Page
홈페이지
검색 
전체메뉴